From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 08:34:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84137F13 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 08:34:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x229.google.com (mail-lb0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E23E3992 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 08:34:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id p9so8768792lbv.0 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 00:34:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=OT2blEnq96JffyB0fp64URBu0JnQBVOJWk9GBjDYW0c=; b=pukx8VS6Zm4gUdYpn0g8aq16lBakd/7Lt3yuYieUtHfg5ugnhx4O8Kh5laBgBDThhs FWI8yjFDrAPTW6Hw70qv1vohwF5oxvh3RQMc55R2CX+uDx4DKU82yJfLkoXm+KmbTV92 dz/iJ1fMqzRm1cC3JhyedLxUFZAWJjnWqM61WD8FTMFj5C543tvot4R+wptgbtlTNTrI L4Mp8V3g4RLAahscG1kI7VzoaUBvG01KPTLbRcMmU1uPY68CPX3cZzSwY21e8nA7PJCA /ww/hQQuoWXJpI3016myIrM9xEuAUqgMw8jXPZ3pF9Q5Q73+86R2LU4RGr1l1XN10DgG npyQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.210.100 with SMTP id mt4mr28827930lbc.31.1418632474646; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 00:34:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.160.68 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 00:34:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20141117193354.T31139@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:34:34 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: dragonflybsd's ipfw From: Sato Kentney To: Luigi Rizzo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Net X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 08:34:38 -0000 hi ok. i will test it. but he said it is faster 2014-12-15 15:26 GMT+08:00 Luigi Rizzo : > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Sato Kentney > wrote: > > hi, > > his ipfw2 is ok for test now. > > http://www.dragonflydigest.com/2014/12/11/15220.html > > i meet some problem in testing so asking qesstion in drafonflybsd's ema= il > > list. > > and i want to know is it correct that the ipfw2 is faster than ipfw in > > freebsd? it is what he said. > > i don't think he ever said that, and in any case the code seems to be > taken straight from the 2002 freebsd version so i highly doubt there > is any speed difference (let alone a measurable one with packets > going through the kernel stack; to see an actual performance difference > you'd need to run the code through netmap or some high speed framework) > > see http://code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/ > > cheers > luigi > > > sure i will test it by myself. > > thanks > > > > On 25 November 2014 at 09:17, bycn82 wrote: > >> > >> *that ipfw2 means "ipfw too", because it is originally from FreeBSD an= d > >> totally not new create things, IMHO* > >> > >> *BTW Sato, I think the in-kernel NAT is almost there, I tested the bas= ic > >> NAT and it works in my lab environment.* > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Sato Kentney > >> wrote: > >> > >>> i agree, > >>> i am not good in english as networking administor from Tokyo. > >>> but when i read the page, i see that the main idea is so call "modula= r > >>> design" and there is a long way to catch up the freebsd's ipfw > >>> > >>> anyway, i dont think it can compare to freebsd's ipfw, as Smith said > their > >>> ipfw is the version without in-kernel NAT and tables .all these > important > >>> features > >>> > >>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Ian Smith > wrote: > >>> > >>> > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:48:13 +0800, Sato Kentney wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > I saw a email in dragonflybsd email list, someone is doing this! > >>> > > http://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/ipfw2/ > >>> > > >>> > We've had 'ipfw2' for a very long while. I couldn't help wondering > why > >>> > DF wouldn't just import our many years of development and experienc= e > >>> > rather than using bycn82's 'rewrite'? .. but DF already has ipfw2: > >>> > > >>> > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/cgi/web-man?command=3Dipfw§ion=3DA= NY > >>> > > >>> > man page dated October 2008. Before tables, in-kernel NAT, later > >>> > dummynet updates and no doubt more. So why not start from there? > >>> > > >>> > cheers, Ian > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> =E3=81=82=E3=82=8A=E3=81=8C=E3=81=A8=E3=81=86 > >>> =E4=BD=90=E8=97=A4=E6=9F=AF=E5=BE=B7 > >>> Sato K. > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " > >>> > >> > >> > > > > -- > > =E3=81=82=E3=82=8A=E3=81=8C=E3=81=A8=E3=81=86 > > =E4=BD=90=E8=97=A4=E6=9F=AF=E5=BE=B7 > > Sato K. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > -- > -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- > Prof. Luigi RIZZO, rizzo@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione > http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa > TEL +39-050-2211611 . via Diotisalvi 2 > Mobile +39-338-6809875 . 56122 PISA (Italy) > -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- > --=20 =E3=81=82=E3=82=8A=E3=81=8C=E3=81=A8=E3=81=86 =E4=BD=90=E8=97=A4=E6=9F=AF=E5=BE=B7 Sato K.