From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 24 18:07:59 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8D216A420
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 18:07:59 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from joseph.koshy@gmail.com)
Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.192])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB98A43D68
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 18:07:58 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from joseph.koshy@gmail.com)
Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so1437781wxc
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:07:56 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	b=MaFTZRqEoeH+5pFuWp3yFMpZTCYwEzP+E+B5lMDsexn/HkJ2ahKVVBT200b22n81CYeCgHNOxAare2SXjL6cILnXb1LQIVvD5uOfFHWJW6VhzbXPwYAOoz6tacm1sYp8CElCntKJ1p5XtuOyjjhhMVGVdVE2ogASdNc63kj+XWg=
Received: by 10.70.108.5 with SMTP id g5mr6690763wxc;
	Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:07:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.70.105.13 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:07:55 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <84dead720511241007g44770cabufbb1f51bd9927572@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 23:37:55 +0530
From: Joseph Koshy <joseph.koshy@gmail.com>
To: Mayank Kumar <mayank@microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A5384BC2FBA4C488865F2275A036BFF040B269C@APS-MSG-01.southpacific.corp.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <3A5384BC2FBA4C488865F2275A036BFF040B269C@APS-MSG-01.southpacific.corp.microsoft.com>
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: What is the correct behaviour for local socket(AF_UNIX) in the
	following scenario?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 18:07:59 -0000

> Now if there is no process p2 to read the data written by
> process p1 from the same localsocket, then this has resulted
> in a huge memory leak on a FreeBSD system.

How are you measuring the 'leak', and which version of FreeBSD
are you using?

--
FreeBSD Volunteer,     http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy