From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 16 20:00:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145EF16A5A1 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 20:00:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A8843D1D for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 20:00:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i7GK0vOa089532; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:00:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost)i7GK0vF8089531; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:00:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:00:57 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Brooks Davis Message-ID: <20040816200057.GB89422@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20040816194833.GA89422@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20040816195502.GA16428@odin.ac.hmc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040816195502.GA16428@odin.ac.hmc.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Possible to run i386 binaries on AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 20:00:58 -0000 On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:55:02PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:48:33PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > Is it possible to run I386 binaries on an AMD64 FreeBSD system? > > For the most part, yes. I use a static i386 perforce binary on my test > box and it's always worked for me. Peter added a script to build 32-bit > libs in src/tools/lib32 but I haven't used it yet. You can also run > i386-linux binaries as of today. > The script is massively broken because of the recent changes to make(1) and the recent import of gcc 3.4.2. I've spent a few days trying to get it to work, but my only reward is frustration. Oh, I should have mentions I can run my static i386 binaries, it is dynamically linked binaries that trouble me. -- Steve