From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 3 21:09:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E066DA38; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 21:09:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.digiware.nl (smtp.digiware.nl [31.223.170.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D5BBD01; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 21:09:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rack1.digiware.nl (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E3B16A404; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 22:09:37 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at digiware.nl Received: from smtp.digiware.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by rack1.digiware.nl (rack1.digiware.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aIl7h0dIUysh; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 22:09:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.9] (vaio [192.168.10.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF00F16A406; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 22:09:24 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <547F7C05.10404@digiware.nl> Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 22:09:25 +0100 From: Willem Jan Withagen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Lepore , Warren Block Subject: Re: Trying to upgrade from 9.3-Stable to 10.1-Stable References: <547EFE22.6050801@digiware.nl> <1417620100.1064.72.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> In-Reply-To: <1417620100.1064.72.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 21:09:46 -0000 On 3-12-2014 16:21, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 08:18 -0700, Warren Block wrote: >> On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: >> >>> Trying to compile world for upgrading I run into: >>> (single threaded make) >>> >>> ===> lib/clang/libclanganalysis (depend) >>> clang-tblgen -gen-clang-attr-list -I >>> /usr/src10/lib/clang/libclanganalysis/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include >>> -d AttrList.inc.d -o AttrList.inc.h >>> /usr/src10/lib/clang/libclanganalysis/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td >>> clang-tblgen -gen-clang-attr-classes -I >>> /usr/src10/lib/clang/libclanganalysis/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include >>> -d Attrs.inc.d -o Attrs.inc.h >>> /usr/src10/lib/clang/libclanganalysis/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td >>> Stack dump: >>> 0. Program arguments: clang-tblgen -gen-clang-attr-classes -I >>> /usr/src10/lib/clang/libclanganalysis/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include >>> -d Attrs.inc.d -o Attrs.inc.h >>> /usr/src10/lib/clang/libclanganalysis/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td >>> *** Signal 11 >>> >>> Is this because the 9.3 toolchain doesn't like 10.1...?? >>> >>> Upgrade is on a atom running: >>> 9.3-STABLE FreeBSD 9.3-STABLE #56 r269952: Thu Aug 14 07:00:37 CEST 2014 >> >> 'make toolchain' can help before trying a buildworld for a different >> major version. > > toolchain is one of the early steps run during buildworld, invoking it > separately shouldn't make any difference. > > This looks like it ran out of memory... check syslog or dmesg, see if > you have some "process killed; out of swap space" messages. Building > clang needs a ton of memory. This is what dmesg says: pid 251 (clang-tblgen), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) pid 252 (clang-tblgen), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) pid 253 (clang-tblgen), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) pid 25518 (clang-tblgen), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) System has 4Gb of mem. No complaints about out of swap. There is 4Gb of swap reserved. Perhaps I should go the royal way, and go for 10.0 as intermediate step? --WjW