From owner-freebsd-current Sat May 16 18:10:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA06661 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 16 May 1998 18:10:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA06654 for ; Sat, 16 May 1998 18:10:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA10280; Sat, 16 May 1998 21:10:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 21:10:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199805170110.VAA10280@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Eivind Eklund Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf param.c src/sys/kern uipc_domain.c uipc_proto.c uipc_socket.c uipc_socket2.c uipc_usrreq.c src/sys/ In-Reply-To: <19980517003024.49844@follo.net> References: <19980516200156.30364@follo.net> <199805162159.OAA13568@usr02.primenet.com> <19980517003024.49844@follo.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < said: > Can't see that that makes things much different. I'd say this is why having > to allocate things in the bottom half of the kernel is annoying. "Got to > roll with the punch" etc. A rewrite of the socket layer which delayed creation of the new socket until the user process had a chance to run accept(2) (or woke up during a select/poll) would be a good thing. (However, such a change would result in a significant semantic difference for accept() -- not necessarily a bad thing.) -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message