From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 22:00:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A0C1065670; Fri, 18 May 2012 22:00:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5718FC0A; Fri, 18 May 2012 22:00:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4IM0GhX000990; Fri, 18 May 2012 22:00:16 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q4IM0GxP000989; Fri, 18 May 2012 22:00:16 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 00:00:13 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Erwin Lansing Message-ID: <20120518220013.GA63744@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <4301C0E3-3C53-46E2-B5A5-7BD120CD775F@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4301C0E3-3C53-46E2-B5A5-7BD120CD775F@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] New framework options aka optionng X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 22:00:17 -0000 --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:41:32PM -0400, Erwin Lansing wrote: > Hi, >=20 > portmgr has been working for long on a new option framework for the ports= to improve some of the deficiencies in the current framework. The new fra= mework not only streamlines the current inconsistencies, but also adds new = paradigms like exclusive options, one-of-many, many-of-many, and more. >=20 > All the details has been documented and written down on the wiki: > http://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/Options/OptionsNG >=20 > Documentation on how to use it available here > http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/rendered/porters-optionsng.html#MAKEFILE-O= PTIONS >=20 > patch here: > http://people.freebsd.org/~portmgr/optionsng.diff >=20 > The two only ports that are known broken ghostscript8 and ghostscript9: > patch available here: > http://people.freebsd.org/~portmgr/ghostscript-optionsng.patch >=20 > I'd like to specially thanks crees for help on documentation. >=20 > regards, > Bapt_______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" A bug was spotted by Bryan Drewery and has been fixed, http://people.freebsd.org/~portmgr/optionsng.diff has been updated. FYI the bug was: the option framework did take correctly the default values, when set with the old OPTIONS format. regards, Bapt --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+2xm0ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyDfACgk+Q/GIZpOWXr2WkJrH81rheJ FZgAoJPDyzrom9/oZXK9H5YC3TSaO8F5 =vHa9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--