From owner-freebsd-current Sat Dec 15 16:43:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89EA37B405 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2001 16:43:53 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) id fBG0hbS18659; Sat, 15 Dec 2001 16:43:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 16:43:37 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200112160043.fBG0hbS18659@apollo.backplane.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Andrew Kenneth Milton , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [OT] RMS Suing was [SUGGESTION] - JFS for FreeBSD References: <52753.1008153029@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :> :>Just to balance this point out; :> :>Only the copyright holder can do this, what code of any significance has :>RMS contributed recently to this or any other project where this would be :>a consideration? : :Uh, people have been signing their copyright over to FSF for a long :time... : :-- :Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 I am aware that certain long-standing RMS-specific projects, like emacs, require people who submit patches to sign-over their copyright, but I am not aware of people generally signing the copyright for their own GPL'd works over to the FSF. RMS wnats people to, but as far as I can tell most people have no desire to. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message