From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 8 20:02:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 299D8631; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 20:02:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E26072F93; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 20:02:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id kp13so3953085pab.35 for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 13:02:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZBXuRRbTKp753l88MLYIQlKsrU7YMQ7dr0J3nwjf8xE=; b=zGsUh6PgnKnJO7BP0dnED/1jaDvv7wj8X1TcautD5rtrx8uks2pPnOG7OQ013LS5Wv MOJrNwvenhId35A+tAdL20XQHoplFPd3n5uEAia6ztcbdsMoerRjv/sTBd4p2cBx2K9z M32R9k+SX4E0dGTT1bzxGJcIXodbKCjN/GS1oGN4ghLtMtiA99ee8YNfDC2iLf13EnT0 QvWAk+QjWffXTbCxsU48gkaANvlTqMi5kiSelJFhBku944bSpzn+siGAVD00Q4gz0Dph 84YFod7PKLX5GhINtCoC3XSA7Dnp2hYlOJ0j4l91kAaCnK727LXwzS52bq05d+Kje7uF bLnA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.102.70 with SMTP id fm6mr7989102pab.57.1375992134500; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 13:02:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.67.14.66 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 13:02:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <52035753.1080006@omnilan.de> References: <20120829060158.GA38721@x2.osted.lan> <20120831052003.GA91340@x2.osted.lan> <20120905201531.GA54452@x2.osted.lan> <20120917140055.GA9037@x2.osted.lan> <52028C31.6060908@omnilan.de> <52035753.1080006@omnilan.de> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 13:02:14 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ip_vBuaaUcHPGXGegchzaQX-vAk Message-ID: Subject: Re: MPSAFE VFS -- List of upcoming actions From: Kevin Oberman To: Harald Schmalzbauer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Attilio Rao , FreeBSD FS , FreeBSD current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 20:02:15 -0000 On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer < h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> wrote: > Bez=C3=BCglich Kevin Oberman's Nachricht vom 08.08.2013 01:11 (localtime= ): > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer < > > h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> wrote: > > > >> Bez=C3=BCglich Attilio Rao's Nachricht vom 14.10.2012 02:27 (localtim= e): > >>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Attilio Rao > >> wrote: > >>>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Attilio Rao > >> wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao > >> wrote: > >>>>>> 2012/7/4 Attilio Rao : > >>>>>>> 2012/6/29 Attilio Rao : > >>>>>>>> As already published several times, according to the following > plan: > >>>>>>>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/NONMPSAFE_DEORBIT_VFS > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I still haven't heard from Vivien or Edward, anyway as NTFS is > >>>>>>> basically only used RO these days (also the mount_ntfs code just > >>>>>>> permits RO mounting) I stripped all the uncomplete/bogus write > >> support > >>>>>>> with the following patch: > >>>>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/ntfs_remove_write.patch > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> This is an attempt to make the code smaller and possibly just foc= us > >> on > >> > >> ... > >> > >>> I've committed the FUSE support into base as r241519. > >> Thank you for your great work! > >> I had used > >> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/fuse_import/fuse_stable9_241030.patch > >> with releng/9.1. > >> Some improovements were made in the meantime in head. > >> I'm not familiar with svn. > >> Was it possible to generate a new patchset against releng/9.2? I'd hav= e > >> to concat manually downloadad revisions via svnweb... :-( > >> > >> Thanks a lot, > >> > >> -Harry > >> > >> Already done. All of the changes in head have been back-ported to > > 9.2-PRERELEASE with the exception of a locking enhancement not availabl= e > > outside of current. You can find it at: > > > https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9QNUQlebx5UdlhPUTB4TXF6enc/edit?usp=3Dsh= aring > > Great, I found accidentally the download-arrow for > fuse_stable9_253631.patch after enabling java script - not used to > google interfaces... (for those who want to get the patch with > fetch/wget/...: > > ftp://ftp.omnilan.de/pub/FreeBSD/OmniLAN/deploy-tools/local-patches/RELEN= G_9_2/no_autoapply/fuse_stable9_253631.patch.orig > ) > > There's still only GENERIC for amd64 altered to include fuse by default. > Any reason why not i386? I'd not include it in any GENERIC kernel, I'd > prefer keeping it loadable... > > Just for interest, is there a one-liner to get such a patchset out of > svn? Looks like the above was done with local sourcetree, not svn > internally? > > Best regards, > > -Harry > I only updated the patches Attilio provided several months ago for 9-STABLE, and his patch-set only added the option for amd64. I see no reason that it should not be in i386, as well, but had not noticed since I run amd64 these days. You can certainly try adding the option to GENERIC on an i386 system and see what happens. I suspect it will work fine. If so (and unless I hear a reason not to from Attilio) I'll update the patch-set to do it. Kevin --=20 R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com