From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jun 7 07:06:32 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id HAA18939 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 7 Jun 1995 07:06:32 -0700 Received: from asstdc.scgt.oz.au (root@asstdc.scgt.oz.au [202.14.234.65]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA18923 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 1995 07:05:39 -0700 Received: (from imb@localhost) by asstdc.scgt.oz.au (8.6.12/BSD4.4) id AAA09999 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 8 Jun 1995 00:05:09 +1000 From: michael butler Message-Id: <199506071405.AAA09999@asstdc.scgt.oz.au> Subject: iij-ppp route problem ? To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 8 Jun 1995 00:05:08 +1000 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24beta] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1314 Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I was "playing with" the user-process ppp with a view to implementing a demand-dial set up here and I fell over this .. ppp ON asstdc> show route default 202.14.234.68 ffffffff UG (1) 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 ffffffff UH (3) 128.95.1.4 202.14.234.68 ffffffff UGH (1) 128.95.44.29 202.14.234.68 ffffffff UGH (1) [ .. lots of routes that "netstat -r" doesn't show .. ] 198.41.0.5 202.14.234.68 ffffffff UGH (1) 202.12.127.0 202.14.234.69 00000000 UG (1) 202.12.127.65 202.14.234.69 ffffffff UGH (1) 202.12.127.67 202.14.234.69 ffffffff UGH (1) 202.14.234.49 202.14.234.68 ffffffff UGH (1) 202.14.234.64 6.0.0.0 00000000 U (1) 202.14.234.65 6.0.6.0 ffffffff UH (3) 202.14.234.68 6.0.6.0 ffffffff UH (1) 202.14.234.69 6.0.6.0 ffffffff UH (1) 202.14.234.79 6.0.0.0 ffffffff UH (1) 203.2.75.2 202.14.234.68 ffffffff UGH (1) 204.157.227.56 202.14.234.68 ffffffff UGH (1) 224.0.0.0 6.0.0.0 00000000 U (1) .. huh ? .. 6.0.6.0 and 6.0.0.0 ? So, two questions .. why strange numbers and why does "netstat -r" not show these routes ?, michael