From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Jun 20 22:22:36 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (H-135-207-30-102.research.att.com [135.207.30.102])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DD337B40D
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 22:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alliance.research.att.com (alliance.research.att.com [135.207.26.26])
	by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E6F4CE2F
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 01:22:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46])
	by alliance.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA20184
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 01:22:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Received: (from fenner@localhost)
	by windsor.research.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) id WAA26003;
	Thu, 20 Jun 2002 22:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200206210522.WAA26003@windsor.research.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
To: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: libpcap vs. up-to-date <net/bpf.h> Re: i386 tinderbox failure
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 22:22:31 -0700
Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.4c/makemail 2.9d
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Ok, so I broke world.  What I don't get is how -- why doesn't the
build use the up to date includes?

  Bill

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message