From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Feb 26 0:24:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (flutter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.147]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D90C37B401 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 00:24:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1Q8P6M18976; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:25:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: "Kenneth D. Merry" Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sbufs in userland In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 26 Feb 2001 00:33:19 MST." <20010226003319.A19994@panzer.kdm.org> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:25:06 +0100 Message-ID: <18974.983175906@critter> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20010226003319.A19994@panzer.kdm.org>, "Kenneth D. Merry" writes: >1. Should we put sbufs in userland? Yes. >2. If we do put sbufs in userland, what is the best way to do it? > There are three different ways I can think of: I think that libsbuf makes sense. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message