From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Sep 5 18: 7:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E6037B400 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 18:07:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org (hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org [64.239.180.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C053143E4A for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 18:07:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dave@jetcafe.org) Received: from hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8617K197960; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 18:07:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dave@hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org) Message-Id: <200209060107.g8617K197960@hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Terry Lambert Cc: "Neal E. Westfall" , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why did evolution fail? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 18:07:15 -0700 From: Dave Hayes Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Terry Lambert writes: > Dave Hayes wrote: >> > No, it's because you won't defend your statements when they >> > appear to break down. >> >> They only break down because you are attacking them. > > Regardless of the reason, they are broken down. But not irregardless of the assumptions, "data", and worldview of the person breaking them down. > The cause is not germane to the observation that they are broken > down. Stop trying to dodge responsibility. ------ Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org >>> The opinions expressed above are entirely my own <<< I have no doctrine to give people -- I just cure ailments and unlock fetters. -Zen Teaching To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message