Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:45:04 -0400 From: Carmel <carmel_ny@hotmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Version of "opencv-core-2.3.1" Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP34ED4859AB77CE5BBACA7C93080@phx.gbl> In-Reply-To: <CADLo83-A-4riwwBqXz05adXopgD%2BnY=2bXX17xyf__hWT%2BjbhQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <BLU0-SMTP124381DBDEC52F570FEF1CA93080@phx.gbl> <4E75DE55.7080206@infracaninophile.co.uk> <BLU0-SMTP176E9578B891A9292981B7493080@phx.gbl> <CADLo83-A-4riwwBqXz05adXopgD%2BnY=2bXX17xyf__hWT%2BjbhQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 15:14:56 +0100 Chris Rees articulated: > On 18 Sep 2011 15:02, "Carmel" <carmel_ny@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:04:37 +0100 > > Matthew Seaman articulated: > > > > > If you wait for a few hours and re-csup it should be fixed. > > > AFAIK, I don't think this affects portsnap because it generates > > > the INDEX in a different way. Or you can create your own INDEX > > > if you want. > > > > Thanks Mathew for you info. I am using "portsnap" so apparently it > > does exhibit this behavior. I any case, since it is apparently not > > a critical problem I will just ignore it for now. > > Since Matthew pointed out that the versions were actually going > forwards, you can indeed fix this with make fetchindex. Running "make fetchindex" then "/usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL=" results in the exact same output as I originally reported. I reran "portsnap" to see if that made any difference and it did not. Maybe this is just a localized phenomena. In any case, if it doesn't affect anything, I am not going to go all ballistic over it. -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BLU0-SMTP34ED4859AB77CE5BBACA7C93080>