From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 2 02:21:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CDFC106564A; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 02:21:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eadler@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4338FC12; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 02:21:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA22LvFO091529; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 02:21:57 GMT (envelope-from eadler@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from eadler@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id pA22LvOa091525; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 02:21:57 GMT (envelope-from eadler) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 02:21:57 GMT Message-Id: <201111020221.pA22LvOa091525@freefall.freebsd.org> To: kamikaze@bsdforen.de, eadler@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org From: eadler@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/162178: Add bsd.clang.mk with Clang/LLVM support X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 02:21:57 -0000 Synopsis: Add bsd.clang.mk with Clang/LLVM support State-Changed-From-To: open->suspended State-Changed-By: eadler State-Changed-When: Wed Nov 2 02:21:55 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: portmgr territory. This should be discussed on the mailing list prior to reopening it. Thanks for looking into this. I'm sure portmgr will have a lot more to say - I know they did with my version of a similar patch ;) Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->portmgr Responsible-Changed-By: eadler Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Nov 2 02:21:55 UTC 2011 Responsible-Changed-Why: portmgr territory. This should be discussed on the mailing list prior to reopening it. Thanks for looking into this. I'm sure portmgr will have a lot more to say - I know they did with my version of a similar patch ;) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=162178