From owner-cvs-all Fri Aug 28 17:41:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA16407 for cvs-all-outgoing; Fri, 28 Aug 1998 17:41:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA16402 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 1998 17:41:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@backplane.com) Received: (dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.8.8/8.6.5) id RAA20897; Fri, 28 Aug 1998 17:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 17:40:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199808290040.RAA20897@apollo.backplane.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make.conf Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk : :Erm, actually, I believe there was all sorts of objection to this one. : :Just leave make.conf alone and try and stick to the non-contraversial :stuff for awhile; you've stubbed enough toes this week for a start. :) : :- Jordan Well, if we can't come to a consensus for something as trivial and simple as make.conf, I don't hold out much hope being able to submit other fixes and improvements. I don't particularly want to go through 100 emails back and forth for every single thing I submit... I just don't have that sort of time. So make.conf is a test, of sorts. Frankly, I don't see why people are so vapid about simply checking for a make.conf.local. I would like to do that and go on to other more important things, like the icmp-error rate-limiting patch to protect against random-SYN/spoofed network attacks. -Matt Matthew Dillon Engineering, HiWay Technologies, Inc. & BEST Internet Communications (Please include original email in any response)