Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 11:32:37 +0100 From: Zbigniew Bodek <zbb@freebsd.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r260163 - head/sys/dev/ahci Message-ID: <CALF_TxkP7A8xZRSEkbfAm1SGw0nhGwR12aKrOf0EY_c3LCnEWQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201401021345.39250.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <201401012018.s01KI31L014441@svn.freebsd.org> <201401021345.39250.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2014/1/2 John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>: > On Wednesday, January 01, 2014 3:18:03 pm Zbigniew Bodek wrote: >> Author: zbb >> Date: Wed Jan 1 20:18:03 2014 >> New Revision: 260163 >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/260163 >> >> Log: >> Do not attach to PCI bridges in AHCI driver >> >> Some vendors use the same VID:PID combination in AHCI and PCI bridge cards > > Would it be better to require the class to be PCIC_STORAGE instead? > > -- > John Baldwin Hello John. As you can see this is required indirectly when "checking for possible AHCI candidate" but in the loop below the device can still be probed. I will need to contact the person from "Submitted by" to ensure whether adding AHCI_Q_NOFORCE quirk is not going to solve this issue instead. Best regards zbb
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALF_TxkP7A8xZRSEkbfAm1SGw0nhGwR12aKrOf0EY_c3LCnEWQ>