From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Sep 10 17:53:55 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id RAA00226
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 10 Sep 1995 17:53:55 -0700
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA00220
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 10 Sep 1995 17:53:51 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA09951; Sun, 10 Sep 1995 17:50:19 -0700
To: jleppek@suw2k.ess.harris.com (James Leppek)
cc: faulkner@mpd.tandem.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: sig 11 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 10 Sep 1995 12:55:55 EDT."
             <9509101655.AA01584@borg.ess.harris.com> 
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 17:50:19 -0700
Message-ID: <9949.810780619@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> I agree, I do not think anyone here is complaining, just trying
> to pass along information to help isolate the problem or just
> identify that there is a real one. while I wish I had the time
> to be a more active "core" member, the best I can be is part of
> the "informal" test organization and porting apps as time permits
> for local folks running stable. I try to keep up with the 

And this kind of work is appreciated, believe me!  We can't find bugs
unless somebody is occasionally willing to "bleed" a little like this
and help the developers track down problems with configurations they
(the developers) don't have ready access to themselves.

					Jordan