From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Nov 18 17:36:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5F515018 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 17:36:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5051E1C2B; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 19:38:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0D7381B; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 19:38:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 19:38:18 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: taguchi@tohoku.iij.ad.jp Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCL's plus patches In-Reply-To: <14388.43339.834504.26482Z@hirose.tohoku.iij.ad.jp> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 19 Nov 1999 taguchi@tohoku.iij.ad.jp wrote: > - Plus patch has upper compatibility to original one. so other tcl depended > ports will get no damages. > - Plus patch incudes many bug fixes. so we got more stable tcl environments. > - Plus patch contains many enhancements, such as more usefull i18n features, > so it is good for many asian peoples as well as C locale peoples. > > I've already made a patch file. Shall I post it? > > Or should I make "tcl plus" ports? If it's backwards compatable like you say it is, I see no reason for another port. -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message