From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 31 11:42:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from henoch.cc.fh-lippe.de (henoch.cc.fh-lippe.de [193.16.112.72]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF4137BE92; Wed, 31 May 2000 11:42:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lkoeller@cc.fh-lippe.de) Received: from spock.cc.fh-lippe.de([193.16.118.120]) (3122 bytes) by henoch.cc.fh-lippe.de via sendmail with P:esmtp/R:inet_hosts/T:smtp (sender: ) id for ; Wed, 31 May 2000 20:42:16 +0200 (MET DST) (Smail-3.2.0.111 2000-Feb-17 #1 built 2000-Mar-17) Received: from door.lippe.de(placida.cc.fh-lippe.de[193.16.112.184]) (2759 bytes) by spock.cc.fh-lippe.de via sendmail with P:smtp/R:smart_host/T:smtp (sender: ) id for ; Wed, 31 May 2000 20:42:14 +0200 (MET DST) (Smail-3.2.0.111 2000-Feb-17 #1 built 2000-Mar-17) Received: from odie.lippe.de (root@odie.lippe.de [192.168.4.2]) by door.lippe.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA21684; Wed, 31 May 2000 20:17:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lkoeller@lippe.de) Received: from odie.lippe.de (lkoeller@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by odie.lippe.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA15397; Wed, 31 May 2000 20:17:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lkoeller@odie.lippe.de) Message-Id: <200005311817.UAA15397@odie.lippe.de> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 From: Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6ller?= To: sobomax@FreeBSD.org Cc: lkoeller@cc.fh-lippe.de, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/18644: hylafax and libtiff-3.4 In-reply-to: sobomax's message of Wed, 31 May 2000 07:14:46 -0700. <200005311414.HAA25675@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Face: eCcoCV}FjV*O{6>[1$XP/e%]TJhEw2MF33dFh)^HM7Gfd=[/(4+0a$~ Synopsis: hylafax and libtiff-3.4 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed > State-Changed-By: sobomax > State-Changed-When: Wed May 31 07:09:25 PDT 2000 > State-Changed-Why: > It is not a FreeBSD problem at all. It is unlikely that we would raise > tiff-3.4 from the dead just to run hylafax. Try to bug hylafax > developers instead. Sorry, but that's not the right way I think! When you have a pice of software, that's really running stable which depends on software xyz, than you will do the hell and backport every new version of xyz into your software. You can do what you want, there are more bugs/problems than before. So I guess it is absolutely necessary to have a concept for this situation, and not to make preassure to the authors of a well working software, especially if they don't need the news features of software xyz. Only my opinion ..... Best regards Lars -- E-Mail: | Lars Koeller Lars.Koeller@Uni-Bielefeld.DE | UNIX Sysadmin lkoeller@cc.fh-lippe.de | Computing Center PGP-key: | University of Bielefeld http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/www-key.html | Germany ----------- FreeBSD, what else? ---- http://www.freebsd.org ------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message