From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 22 17:14:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CE0106566B; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:14:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com (mail-fx0-f222.google.com [209.85.220.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879A88FC08; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so2456899fxm.36 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:14:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=UAT+3JXMTKL8zmMpNVmghOoTdxsNngMw9vIMFmQL+xM=; b=PsrjpGmWo9B0Z2GRtFJXWfSgrSBjN6t4ci8uUI+mzC8clceWyNwFsuTEyoqX3fVIpr oSHuyunkc37FSzsdElrZaJw9C8DLQ2tHrbhz44wm1mEYohA/oS2erhEvNzJ8AC56W1Rr ou/8Lda/djrHVM2AW8wFT10tc8ow8/gvIaK9o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=FFxL5kSaUZS/Wip5dxCXdVZtRnvITrUqhmZV6HIinfzmuC7SjZrQoeuTQB8h+qjlzk oiIv75qTQz+1CVgQ/4znj3aMeUJ4D4CqZJAH/HVLmfbuwZ1E6Z1RQ2paSHsk6P5F4eUy Ss0dyaRFzn4bhxWTe8H4gjL72dV3Ogu7Hx5LQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.170.35 with SMTP id q35mr97918hbe.150.1253639652271; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:14:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AB90448.9020706@FreeBSD.org> References: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl> <20090922135435.36a3d40e@lazybytes.org> <4AB90448.9020706@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:14:12 -0300 Message-ID: <19e9a5dc0909221014o14e88c96ubf32142b85d781d@mail.gmail.com> From: Gonzalo Nemmi To: Doug Barton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Sergey Vinogradov , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND in the base (Was: Re: tmux(1) in base) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:14:14 -0000 ... and what about sendmail?? couldn't it be easily replaced by DMA Regards Gonzalo On 9/22/09, Doug Barton wrote: > Sergey Vinogradov wrote: >> The things in the base system I always wondered about are sendmail >> and bind9. These are pretty heavy, and definitely are not used in every >> single installation. Maybe someday I'll see sendmail and bind9 in ports >> instead of base system. And yes, I know about WITHOUT_BIND= and >> WITHOUT_SENDMAIL= :) > > For about the millionth time ... :) > > I would be perfectly happy to remove BIND, however most people want > some or all of dig, host, or nslookup in the base, which means that > about 60% or more of the BIND source code has to be there to allow > that. From there it's a pretty simple leap to "let's build it all then > because that's how we've always done it." > > The next-best thing would be to flip the knobs so that we're not > building named and friends by default which I'm happy to do if people > want it done, but no one ever comes up with a clear consensus to do it. > > > Doug > > -- > > This .signature sanitized for your protection > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >