From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Nov 21 13:10:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from spammie.svbug.com (mg128-177.ricochet.net [204.179.128.177]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E2337B4C5; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 13:10:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from spammie.svbug.com (localhost.mozie.org [127.0.0.1]) by spammie.svbug.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA00447; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 13:09:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jessem@spammie.svbug.com) Message-Id: <200011212109.NAA00447@spammie.svbug.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 13:09:27 -0800 (PST) From: opentrax@email.com Reply-To: opentrax@email.com Subject: Re: 4.2-RC1 not (easily) bootable To: msmith@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: khera@kciLink.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200011201941.eAKJfWF13969@mass.osd.bsdi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 20 Nov, Mike Smith wrote: >> >>>>> "DO" == David O'Brien writes: >> >> DO> Why did you choose a "dangerously dedicated" install? "dangerously >> DO> dedicated" might go away in the future (as it doesn't leave space enough >> DO> space for boot0). Unless the normal slice configuration won't work for >> DO> you, there really is no good reason to use "dangerously dedicated". >> >> I have two machines that wouldn't boot unless I installed them in DD >> mode. Am I to infer that at some date they will no longer run >> FreeBSD because DD mode goes away? > > Nope. You will just have to install them correctly, and you'll be fine. > Why does this feel like the phone company talking? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message