From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 8 14:09:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93196D; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:09:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bright@mu.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D1825F0; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Alfreds-MacBook-Pro-9.local (c-76-21-10-192.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.21.10.192]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FD701A3D4F; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 07:09:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <52541202.3010707@mu.org> Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 07:09:06 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer Subject: Re: rcs References: <77307DF8-637D-4295-BF47-8742F1552CE8@orthanc.ca> <20131008031517.GA31864@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <60177810-8DC4-4EA3-8040-A834B79039D2@orthanc.ca> <52538EDC.2080001@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <52538EDC.2080001@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" , Lyndon Nerenberg , Steve Kargl X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:09:05 -0000 On 10/7/13 9:49 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 10/8/13 11:19 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: >> On 2013-10-07, at 8:15 PM, Steve Kargl >> wrote: >> >>> Maybe there was no development for 15 years. However, the 7364 >>> lines in ChangeLog after 2010-02-04 suggests that there may >>> be few bugs to worry about. > > I think the fact is that most direct users of RCS use it in a very > simple way, and > it works just fine for that. with no real need for any updates or any > change. With all due respect Julian, The more we discuss this more this really points to the problem that FreeBSD appears to be a challenge to install packages into such that a package moving out of base is such a big deal. Can we fix that instead? I mean, this change should really not be a big deal, but yet it is and this speaks to the core of FreeBSD utility. So again, is there a way to make it so adding RCS after install is not a big deal at all? -- Alfred Perlstein