From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 18 18:07:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B448A37B401; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 18:07:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728AB43F85; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 18:07:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.8/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h6J17TAI013811; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 21:07:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 21:07:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com To: "David O'Brien" In-Reply-To: <20030719001523.GA85201@dragon.nuxi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Scott Long cc: David Xu cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libpthread Makefile src/lib/libpthread/test sigsuspend_d.c src/lib/libpthread/thread thr_cancel.c thr_concurrency.c thr_nanosleep.c thr_private.h thr_sig.c thr_sigmask.c ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: deischen@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 01:07:34 -0000 On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 05:10:21PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > ... > > I'd like to see the emphasis put more on the s; if > > they are going to be Tier-1, provide the necessary libkse > > bits :-) > > Who are "the arches"? KSE is a new feature, so the responsibility is on > the KSE developers to complete their implementation on all Tier-1 > platforms. I've offered Alpha boxes to all the KSE developers and have > had zero takers... (same for i386 SMP boxes... but that's another story) I don't recall being offered an SMP box, but perhaps you're talking about the kernel hackers (mostly David & Julian). Yes, KSE is relatively new, but it has been in the tree for a while now. You can't expect the KSE guys to be knowledgeable in all the archs. For someone that is, though, it should be very easy. Adding support for KSE really, really, pales in comparison to the kernel MD bits. I think putting the onus on us for all the archs is a little unfair. We are more than happy to do some of the work and help guide others. -- Dan Eischen