From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 14:30:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9BD16A4CE for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:30:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D7643D31 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:30:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0HMUKFR042314 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:30:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0HMUKAO042308; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:30:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:30:20 -0800 (PST) Resent-Message-Id: <200401172230.i0HMUKAO042308@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Roderick van Domburg Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2335316A4CE for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:23:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from netlx050.vf.utwente.nl (netlx050.vf.utwente.nl [192.87.17.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2A743D2D for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:23:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roderick@stud187236.mobiel.utwente.nl) Received: from stud187236.mobiel.utwente.nl (stud187236.mobiel.utwente.nl [130.89.187.236])i0HMNDf22082 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 23:23:13 +0100 Received: from stud187236.mobiel.utwente.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0HMMX8V084522 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 23:22:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from roderick@stud187236.mobiel.utwente.nl) Received: (from root@localhost)i0HMMXGL084521; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 23:22:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from roderick) Message-Id: <200401172222.i0HMMXGL084521@stud187236.mobiel.utwente.nl> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 23:22:33 +0100 (CET) From: Roderick van Domburg To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113 Subject: bin/61502: Incorrect ip6fw output when adding rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 22:30:23 -0000 >Number: 61502 >Category: bin >Synopsis: Incorrect ip6fw output when adding rules >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sat Jan 17 14:30:19 PST 2004 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Roderick van Domburg >Release: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT sparc64 >Organization: University of Twente >Environment: System: FreeBSD stud187236.mobiel.utwente.nl 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #0: Sun Jan 11 14:03:52 CET 2004 roderick@magog.student.utwente.nl:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MAGOG sparc64 >Description: When adding IPv6 firewall rules without specifying a set rulenumber, 'ip6fw' incorrectly lists the new rule as being added as number 0000 even though it is added under a different rulenumber. >How-To-Repeat: 1. Enable the IPv6 firewall service 2. Add any rule without specifying a number. Example: `ip6fw add allow tcp from any to any` ip6fw reports the rule being added as 0000. 3. Execute `ip6fw show`. The rule will have been added as 0100, assuming the ruleset was flushed. No matter if it was, the rule will have been assigned a correct number different from 0000. However, executing `ip6fw add 100 allow tcp from any to any` during (2) produces output as expected. This incorrect behavior is _not_ displayed on plain IPv6 ipfw on sparc64. I had no architectures readily available to see if all this was platform- specific. >Fix: Unknown. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: