From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 02:25:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CF416A468 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 02:25:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D3813C458 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 02:25:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3C81A4D8D; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:24:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34319513EC; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:25:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D0D61BE8F; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:25:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:25:10 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Randall Stewart Message-ID: <20070614022510.GA61989@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <46706E63.1080906@cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46706E63.1080906@cisco.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KTR and SCTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 02:25:12 -0000 On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 06:23:31PM -0400, Randall Stewart wrote: > All: > > I am in the process of converting all the logging that > SCTP does to use the KTR sub-system. This will fit > nicely.. I still need to do some things to make it > so I can pull out the logs and make pretty charts and > graphs (in SCTP its used for debugging but also exploring > how CC and other niceties works).. > > But I was wondering.. would anyone mind if I took > KTR_SPARE2 > > and made it: > > KTR_SCTP_SUBSYS > > I have a huge amount of tracing under SCTP now.. so > many I am setting in a seperate mask set to enable/disable > various pieces of it.. So I was thinking it would > warrent a sub-system of its own :-D > > Any objections? If not I will change it :-D Yeah, we really do need to keep those spare fields for local use. Kris