From owner-freebsd-current Wed Mar 22 12:41:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FBF537C2DA; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 12:41:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from slave (doug@slave [10.0.0.1]) by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA80861; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 12:40:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 12:40:30 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton X-Sender: doug@dt051n0b.san.rr.com To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Paul Richards , Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS SPS Perth , current@freebsd.org, poul@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another current crash (cvs-cur.6183 In-Reply-To: <29683.953706815@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > But it might actually make a lot of sense to make INVARIANTS the > default this early in the -CURRENT cycle, protests ? What kind of overhead does it add? The warning messages in LINT look rather dire to me, but I'm interested in knowing the facts.. Doug -- "While the future's there for anyone to change, still you know it seems, it would be easier sometimes to change the past" - Jackson Browne, "Fountain of Sorrow" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message