From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 1 14:14:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9ACB16A4CE; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 14:14:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout2.pacific.net.au (mailout2.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3518B43D41; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 14:14:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.86])i51LEO5v015210; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 07:14:24 +1000 Received: from gamplex.bde.org (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246]) i51LEM2O025837; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 07:14:23 +1000 Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 07:14:21 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: John Baldwin In-Reply-To: <200406011558.57696.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <20040602070119.A22013@gamplex.bde.org> References: <200406011558.57696.jhb@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: mdodd@freebsd.org cc: peter@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remove atdevbase? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 21:14:26 -0000 On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, John Baldwin wrote: > I'd like to remove the atdevbase variable and use KERNBASE directly in the few > places it is still used if that is ok. Patch is at Seems reasonable. > http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/kill_atdevbase.patch Review of what I can quote easily: this URL appears to be well formed. What stops normal resource stuff working? Is it just finding the frame buffer for consoles? Bruce