From owner-freebsd-current Thu Nov 19 14:30:17 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA29157 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 14:30:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pau-amma.whistle.com (s205m64.whistle.com [207.76.205.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA29147 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 14:30:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dhw@whistle.com) Received: (from dhw@localhost) by pau-amma.whistle.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA13755 for current@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 14:27:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dhw) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 14:27:16 -0800 (PST) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <199811192227.OAA13755@pau-amma.whistle.com> Subject: Re: Problem with amd (was: NFS problems in -current) Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199811192221.OAA09145@vashon.polstra.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >From: John Polstra >Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 14:21:09 -0800 (PST) >Aha! The new amd uses different options to select the protocol for >NFS. I bet you still have an old amd.map file. For the new amd, >the desired options are "proto=udp,vers=2". How... interesting. So, any recommended strategy for using the *same* amd maps for machines that use both versions of amd? I really like consistency in the maps; that's why I use NIS to provide them. david -- David Wolfskill UNIX System Administrator dhw@whistle.com voice: (650) 577-7158 pager: (650) 371-4621 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message