From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 11 19:32:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8DB106566C; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:32:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from batcilla@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f209.google.com (mail-fx0-f209.google.com [209.85.220.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6FF8FC1B; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:32:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm1 with SMTP id 1so448873fxm.13 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:32:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mR9IXFv6QSO4ZhwnlcUumR4tOXNLZ4dEMfT0m2suNT8=; b=wrfn2TzRjRVUZfAkUCFCEOogK7xo+I6CikqQuW8wGdAv6aIceP5jg+G2EFQkapWtIq H0kVaAcEnuyfwJC9IDEx4/2hJGcIBV/sSfugQsAF/5h4rv5Ih7qP/PZk0Nj1WNaJ71b7 BH62vIARDgoRIrd+hd5J0gUuHYFHkTtYEcgt4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tEoYHhUbD54YivRDOnP7lqhaXey6yj92OB7dlfHIkdfk+utYZKlNPaZWwsVBM185wd pOjuUnXLO9DksSSdEVjaRfq5/4mtzy3u2OVBSdQL/vkOr4XQgwoTGkHVvn4qHSNNriK+ /f/7w0gNrFJB8eCWBZyFavhMRt72qpFxvvR/w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.192.65 with SMTP id d1mr397275hbi.197.1268335974986; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:32:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B741996.8030801@freebsd.org> References: <6c36ec371002101424n28589b53l7d7a14660c04ce08@mail.gmail.com> <4B741996.8030801@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:32:54 +0200 Message-ID: <6c36ec371003111132h15742440k7917ad1d1e3032df@mail.gmail.com> From: batcilla itself To: Rui Paulo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TDMA link cannot pass data X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:32:56 -0000 2010/2/11 Rui Paulo > > On 10/02/2010 22:24, batcilla itself wrote: >>>> >>>> On 3 Jan 2010, at 12:23, Kim Culhan wrote: >> >> [skip...] >> >>> This is odd. What happens without the bridge? >>> >>> -- >>> Rui Paulo >> >> I guess without the bridge ping going w/o any problem. >> >> I also tried couple of configs with wlan in different wlanmode, hostap e= tc: >> it is precisely same as Kim wrote. In case of use routed connection it >> work just fine. >> In case of: >> [host1]----(eth=3D=3D=3Dbridge0=3D=3D=3Dgif)----wlan0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3Dwire= lesslink=3D=3D=3D=3D=3Dwlan0---(gif=3D=3D=3Dbridge0=3D=3D=3Deth)----[host2] >> it is works and host1 can ping host2. >> in case of >> [host1]----(eth=3D=3D=3Dbridge0=3D=3D=3Dwlan0)----=3D=3D=3D=3Dwirelessli= nk=3D=3D=3D=3D-----(wlan0=3D=3D=3Dbridge0=3D=3D=3Detc)---[host2] >> broadcast packets including arp can go through bridge, other packets >> miss after leaving wlan in direction of wirelesslink. >> >> I seen this on very recent 8-STABLE. (FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #1: Thu Feb >> 4 23:03:37 EET 2010) >> >> Can it be somehow linked with experimental bridging support for a mesh? >> May be there is some sysctl need to be set in non-default value. >> >> I also repeat same test with 9-CURRENT ( FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Thu >> Feb =A04 16:16:02 UTC 2010 ). >> >> This is really odd... > > I think this is more likely related to ARP and routing table issues. I as= ked the submitter to use p5-SVN-Bisect in order to find the revision that b= roke. Is there any progress/revision found? I have a good=A0test-place: 2 links outdoor with full control from ethernet side and on-my-table setup also, so I can test almost instantly. Also have a pair of SR71a (3x3 MIMO .11n) - also can test with TDMA or w/o it. Just call. -- //batcilla