From owner-freebsd-net  Wed Jun 16 16:49:30 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7C914D66
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 16:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from itojun@itojun.org)
Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1])
	by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id IAA10200;
	Thu, 17 Jun 1999 08:48:02 +0900 (JST)
To: Sebastien Maraux <smaraux@cpc.westminster.ac.uk>
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: smaraux's message of Tue, 08 Jun 1999 17:03:11 +0100.
      <Pine.BSF.4.10.9906081655410.31552-100000@seth.cpc.wmin.ac.uk> 
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD  90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: a _good_ IPv6 browser 
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 08:48:02 +0900
Message-ID: <10198.929576882@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


>Mozilla 5 recompiled for IPv6 with kame patch does not match my wishes.
>Should I use kame IPv6 release because I'm currently using the one from
>the INRIA?
>Does it really make a big difference?

	(sorry for delayed reply)
	could be.

	Because IPv6 API is still a moving target (RFC is issued though)
	there are many differences in implementations (both visible differences
	and invisible - kernel internal design - differences).
	You cannot assume that userland code for KAME kernel/library to work
	on INRIA kernel/library, or the other way around.  This is quite
	unfortunate to say this, but in reality you need some patch....

itojun


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message