From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Aug  9 15:55:25 2008
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C481065672;
	Sat,  9 Aug 2008 15:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (repoman.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::29])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDAC78FC13;
	Sat,  9 Aug 2008 15:55:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by repoman.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m79FtONK098418;
	Sat, 9 Aug 2008 15:55:24 GMT (envelope-from imp@repoman.freebsd.org)
Received: (from svn2cvs@localhost)
	by repoman.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m79FtO20098417;
	Sat, 9 Aug 2008 15:55:24 GMT (envelope-from imp@repoman.freebsd.org)
Message-Id: <200808091555.m79FtO20098417@repoman.freebsd.org>
X-Authentication-Warning: repoman.freebsd.org: svn2cvs set sender to
	imp@repoman.freebsd.org using -f
From: Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 15:55:10 +0000 (UTC)
To: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: HEAD
Cc: 
Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/pccbb pccbb.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:55:25 -0000

imp         2008-08-09 15:55:10 UTC

  FreeBSD src repository

  Modified files:
    sys/dev/pccbb        pccbb.c 
  Log:
  SVN rev 181470 on 2008-08-09 15:55:10Z by imp
  
  It turns out that checking the first DWORD register is more reliable
  on a variety of cards.  Adjust the comments accordingly to match the
  code.  Even if the vendor chose 0xffff for the device ID, the vendor
  ID can't be 0xffff, so the test is still valid from a standards
  perspective.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.170     +17 -15    src/sys/dev/pccbb/pccbb.c