From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 10 03:27:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBAA16A4ED for ; Tue, 10 May 2005 03:27:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from styx.qala.com.sg (styx.qala.com.sg [210.193.2.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750EF43D31 for ; Tue, 10 May 2005 03:27:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhfoo@nexlabs.com) Received: from [192.168.1.200] (130.210-193-15.adsl.qala.com.sg [210.193.15.130]) by styx.qala.com.sg (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F833448A; Tue, 10 May 2005 11:26:23 +0800 (SGT) Message-ID: <42802AF4.5030304@nexlabs.com> Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 11:31:00 +0800 From: Foo Ji-Haw User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" References: <20050509080352.22220.qmail@web54002.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: *_enable = "YES" for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 03:27:22 -0000 Thanks. I'm just reading up on rcNG. Apparently it's been implemented on 4.10 onwards iianm. Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > > On May 9, 2005, at 2:03 AM, Rob wrote: > >> Foo Ji-Haw wrote: >> >>> Last time I used FreeBSD (4.3), I can start services >>> with just apache2.sh start. Now everything needs to >>> be explicitly turned on via >>> rc.conf (apache2_enable="YES"). Is this rcNG as >>> mentioned in the handbook? Where can I find >>> documentation for this? >>> >>> Is there any way I can still turn start/ stop the >>> services at rc.d/ ? >>> >> >> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache2.sh forcestart > > > Also, if you have old style rc scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d they > will run as well I believe -- without the enable. > > Chad >