Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:18:09 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Duane Whitty <duane@dwlabs.ca> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: priority of make/ports options (?) -- FreeBSD Port: sysutils/portconf Message-ID: <45392F01.6030409@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20061020195339.GF80635@dwpc.dwlabs.ca> References: <4538884A.5080303@pobox.sk> <45392217.9070006@FreeBSD.org> <20061020195339.GF80635@dwpc.dwlabs.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Duane Whitty wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> I must ask, shouldn't the OP be using portmaster
EVERYONE should be using portmaster! (just kidding) :)
> in order to use ports.conf? Isn't portinstall == portupgrade -N
> which uses pkgtools.conf?
No, portmaster and portconf are totally different, and not tied
together in any way. You can use one, the other, or both. portconf
works directly with make/bsd.port.mk the same way that portmaster
works directly with the ports, without any "extra" stuff needed.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45392F01.6030409>