From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 11 15:55:00 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4239E93B;
 Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:55:00 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-qc0-f170.google.com (mail-qc0-f170.google.com
 [209.85.216.170])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDDCEA8F;
 Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:54:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id d42so2288670qca.29
 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 07:54:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
 :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=JuzwGF1sGf+3EfNiIOVcd18uIBxGx3UZq/+hX5rjaLY=;
 b=piw62SsFznEeoIZNs7GNCKCFMZyUmPeB5OjaUMMnUOFD94P/z9iV/MuvB5/5UUky9l
 sslCqtor4ZPy7JvtJ/1jj7JHffpfej964UGWC6IKnKdueJZNhY1nzc3OJe5i1uC11gqj
 IqW4RKg47lgiK12lfcmOwuvP/CoK5z9sBMfC5ngkLaD53IvEtYvx9fb2p9MV2cTJvaov
 qkDEqt2AkJjcgZcFdWEZaujSMNnIEBi7nFnf7AnzyFKv0oL3tA9VRLoJFmMF47o/CE/h
 Gdc8fOxus4SivlNfnq3yTF0QHWag/e5AG+8aj2NfFLSApoyvU6TPwgiwUk44iz/mm3hG
 d5sg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.209.193 with SMTP id gh1mr5712495qab.86.1360598099313;
 Mon, 11 Feb 2013 07:54:59 -0800 (PST)
Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com
Received: by 10.49.71.204 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 07:54:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAFYkXjkACs=2RaCb_BaoNT6PM+5gkQSGoKP5G4bR_284v_Eoig@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFYkXjkACs=2RaCb_BaoNT6PM+5gkQSGoKP5G4bR_284v_Eoig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:54:59 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: N6EfTH4EZlIGUE9RQu3xyep0cx0
Message-ID: <CAFYkXjmr17-M8HW5oSfdxM=qHeeQGufWJE0JOLkToGr_WyJ0Ow@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 9.1 AMD64 multitasking efficiency low
From: CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:55:00 -0000

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:06 PM, CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl> wrote:
> I have found 9.1 to be far more less responsive than 9.0 and previous
> releases on my desktop.

Right now as I backup my data (~250GB) I also notice deadlocks on data
transfers. I also noticed that on another machine (6 cores, 16GB RAM)
with 9.1-RELEASE AMD64. Maybe the responsiveness issue is related to
disk access/transfers..?

-- 
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info