Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 16 Feb 2014 22:42:29 -0600
From:      Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>
To:        David Thiel <lx@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r342592 - head/dns/djbdns
Message-ID:  <53019335.9070505@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140205182713.GG55007@redundancy.redundancy.org>
References:  <201402041915.s14JFidj013872@svn.freebsd.org> <52F20239.7040901@marino.st> <20140205182713.GG55007@redundancy.redundancy.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--mUlq3CbDpoT0V1Ghk36lmBkJxT1MNJ8wx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2/5/2014 12:27 PM, David Thiel wrote:
> On 02/05, John Marino wrote:
>> On 2/4/2014 20:15, David Thiel wrote:
>>> Author: lx
>>> Date: Tue Feb  4 19:15:43 2014
>>> New Revision: 342592
>>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/342592
>>> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r342592/
>>>
>>> Log:
>>>   Remove STAGE support, it screws up the run scripts.
>>>  =20
>>>   PR:		184949
>>>   Submitted by:	issue reported by DrTebi
>>>
>>
>> Stage doesn't change install locations so "run scripts" shouldn't be
>> affected.  Therefore I assume this comment really refers to some kind =
of
>> build/install scripts.
>=20
> It's not an issue of install locations. "run" scripts refers to the
> scripts generated by dnscache-conf and tinydns-conf (entitled "run"),
> which are then put into the service directory and launched by
> daemontools/runit. It needed to be reverted, as this completely broke
> the port, having the launch scripts attempt to run binaries out of the
> stage dir, which had already bitten someone. Given djbdns' rather exoti=
c
> build process, getting those tools to generate the correct scripts whil=
e
> still staging properly will take enough time that I'd rather have the
> port functioning while I figure it out.
>=20

This needs a PORTREVISION bump.

Changes to the generated package require a PORTREVISION bump to rebuild
packages. Because this fixes a runtime issue it definitely needs it.

I have the same problem with staging qmail ports and have not had much
progress staging them.

--=20
Regards,
Bryan Drewery


--mUlq3CbDpoT0V1Ghk36lmBkJxT1MNJ8wx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTAZM1AAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPYbAIALPiqsq7EZj7JXq6LD6LgrdR
aLlnRlf/eCntn/dVwSZTqn1YBMg8aLHw60WqTPcW1eWtxCYBkVM3c2TlIifdteAC
mZ3PImFSAHv8Emf7JexikgIePC5WJq4Q4ZDFc3HfOHeUct2N+EXZVjXJQg9WCMOo
3HtanXQ3Os+OqEn9dYRGUd5WmhHOv4BIaCjJEeLAfjfUQmu+JvKLtzct7yyK0ltU
Hhj5vpjB2pb1/FhWpcfMJjdDWqvwkQ9qzzlMvMxpLqsif/W3yyOUyBUMubs036nH
1jVgD5LVRpdLLsq1f3J+FygUW53F+RjCKJGvwyeEtej6uyaP+kZlGn+d+Btn7JA=
=7DwD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--mUlq3CbDpoT0V1Ghk36lmBkJxT1MNJ8wx--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53019335.9070505>