From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Fri Apr 6 16:16:25 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D821F92202 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:16:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C86841D6 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:16:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B13E2F921FC; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F139F921FB for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:16:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D034841D1 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:16:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88F6B21112 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:16:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w36GGNQo069966 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:16:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w36GGNIk069963 for virtualization@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:16:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 215737] [bhyve] utilizing virtio-net truncates jumbo frames at 4084 bytes length Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 16:16:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: misc X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: des.gaufres@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 16:16:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D215737 --- Comment #10 from P Kern --- (In reply to Harald Schmalzbauer from comment #9) Thanks for the code! Yes vmx(8) does support recv/xmit of 9k frames but in a case where the VM has 2 vmx(8) NICs, the 9k frames do not seem to be able to transit in one NIC and the out the other. So 9k frames only seem to "work" when the traffic terminates at the VM (...?). Just tested this scenario on the same VM with 2 Intel em(8) NICs: 9k frames seem to pass through the VM via em0<-->em1 (mtu 9k on both) without trouble. Under the same setup but with vmx0<-->vmx1, the 9k frames cannot seem to fl= ow thru: traffic will transit only after MTUs are set to 4096. I'd love to tweak the vmx3f driver but then the VM could not be used for anything we put into production (small group here. no other BSD kernel dive= rs). thx again --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=