Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 23:47:28 -0600 From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" <jeff-ml@mountin.net> To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: apache13-php4 Message-ID: <4.3.2.20000330233528.00df0520@207.227.119.2> In-Reply-To: <20000330210930.A60684@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <p0431014db509b59dc64a@[209.239.239.22]> <38D8FD22.E2A9875F@MexComUSA.Net> <20000322134846.V25438@jade.chc-chimes.com> <20000327224807.C7980@physik.TU-Berlin.DE> <20000327155812.C23367@jade.chc-chimes.com> <vqcog7x5l0z.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20000330172419.B59713@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000330203838.H23367@jade.chc-chimes.com> <p0431014db509b59dc64a@[209.239.239.22]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 09:09 PM 3/30/00 -0800, David O'Brien wrote: >On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 05:58:46PM -0800, Jon Rust wrote: > > using apxs). Currently playing with 1.3.12+PHP3.0.15+SSL+FP2000 on my > > beta web server. Very nice! > > > > http://www.westbend.net/~hetzels/mod_apache.tgz > > > > I can't wait for the entire Apache ports system to be replaced with > > this method. > >So what is holding things back? Whose buy-in do we need here? After 2 years there are still disclaimers about using the DSO method in the Apache docs. Even with mod_so in modules/standard. For the most part I customize the port to statically compile in used modules. Even with a few DSO's used, request rates of 2 per second, and heavy CGI don't see any problems. YMMV It would be nice for the future mega-Apache port to allow for DSO and static compilation. Don't have a problem either way, but someone might ask. Jeff Mountin - jeff@mountin.net Systems/Network Administrator FreeBSD - the power to serve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.20000330233528.00df0520>