From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 22 11:02:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A2B16A40F for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:02:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org) Received: from virtual.micronet.sk (smtp.micronet.sk [84.16.32.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58FE843D6E for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:01:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5775310E5CA; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:01:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at virtual.micronet.sk Received: from virtual.micronet.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (virtual.micronet.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3exXPb01m4bP; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:01:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from danger.mcrn.sk (danger.mcrn.sk [84.16.37.254]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163C610E5A1; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:01:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:01:50 +0200 From: Daniel Gerzo Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <619419437.20060922130150@rulez.sk> To: Taras Savchuk In-Reply-To: <4513C20C.3030606@elantech.ru> References: <4513C20C.3030606@elantech.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Pete French Subject: Re[2]: Dovecot 1.0 rc7 on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE/i386 with kqueue eats much CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:02:04 -0000 Hello Taras, Friday, September 22, 2006, 12:59:24 PM, you wrote: > Pete French =D0=C9=DB=C5=D4: >>> this is indeed a nice workaround (at least if it helps :-)), but >>> somebody(tm) should have a look why the kqueue support is broken >>> there in the first place. >>> =20 >> >> I think it's a problem in Dovecot, not FreeBSD - there are a number of >> messages regarding this on the Dovecot lists, including a nunmber of >> attempts to fix the problem. OpenBSD also disables kqueue on their >> port of Dovecot due to it not working properly. >> >> -pete. > I can make additional tests of dovecot with kqueue if somebody gives me > some tips what to do. if this is really a dovecot issue, I think that this topic should be moved to the dovecot's mailing list. --=20 Best regards, Daniel mailto:danger@FreeBSD.org