Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 16:17:01 +0330 From: mokhi <mokhi64@gmail.com> To: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> Cc: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org Subject: Re: C11 conformance of casinl-like functions. Message-ID: <CAByVWPXomH1ijy4oUHjw991c_hgyHQU6Zti1j1jYutxuHE4jcw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20170208221449.K14261@besplex.bde.org> References: <CAByVWPUvbG78nUoxQQAOTTY9dJa1agjCZo9oO3dShv2U8Q=y0A@mail.gmail.com> <20170208221449.K14261@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I think you mean acosl, asinl, ... yeah :D > These were implemented quite well in 2012-2013, but not quite finished, > and not committed. Only the float and double version were committed. > The raw versions are still available in > https://people.freebsd.org/~stephen/catrig*.c. These have rotted and > require some editing. Compare with the committed parts to see most > of the necessary editing. Okay, I'll do. Would you like that I add you on Phabricator for reviewing when my editing is done? Thanks and best wishes, Mokhi.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAByVWPXomH1ijy4oUHjw991c_hgyHQU6Zti1j1jYutxuHE4jcw>