From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Dec 20 10:35:03 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id KAA01928 for isp-outgoing; Fri, 20 Dec 1996 10:35:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from intrastar.net (root@intrastar.net [206.136.25.12]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id KAA01906 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 1996 10:34:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from fixed.intrastar.net (jakes@fixed.intrastar.net [206.136.25.69]) by intrastar.net (8.8.4/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA26484; Fri, 20 Dec 1996 12:38:46 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199612201838.MAA26484@intrastar.net> From: "Jacob Suter" To: "Cliff Addy" , Subject: Re: UUNET vs Netcom Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 12:33:10 -0600 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk ---------- > From: Cliff Addy > To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org > Subject: UUNET vs Netcom > Date: Friday, December 20, 1996 8:03 AM > > We need some fast input on any experience of uunet vs netcom. We need to > install a t-1 to our office. There is a vast difference in monthly cost > ($2200 vs 1200) in these two. Obviously, anything *they* say in terms of > uptime, loads, support, etc, wil be glowing. Do any of the ISPs here have > any input on these issues? Is there another provider we should be looking > at. The rush is on because if we go with uunet, we need to beat a monday > deadline on an end-of-year special they're running. UUNet all the way.... NetScum is NetScum... JS