From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Dec  4 15:56:18 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.3/8.7.3) id PAA23236
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 15:56:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA23228
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 15:56:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.8.3/CET-v2.1) with SMTP id XAA22375; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 23:56:05 GMT
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 08:56:05 +0900 (JST)
From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
Reply-To: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
To: "Jukka A. Ukkonen" <jau@jau.tmt.tele.fi>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: POSIX.4 style extended memory locking???
In-Reply-To: <199612031321.PAA24818@jau.tmt.tele.fi>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.961204162714.18138A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 3 Dec 1996, Jukka A. Ukkonen wrote:

> 
> 	Hi everybody!
> 
> 	Has anyone implemented POSIX.4 style mlockall() and munlockall()
> 	for FreeBSD already?

I don't think so, I think Ron Minnich had interest in this.

Mike Hancock