From owner-freebsd-questions  Sun May 19 16:40:23 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA08157
          for questions-outgoing; Sun, 19 May 1996 16:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bonsai.its.utas.edu.au (root@bonsai.its.utas.edu.au [131.217.13.8])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA08146
          for <FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 19 May 1996 16:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from root@localhost) by bonsai.its.utas.edu.au (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA08065; Mon, 20 May 1996 09:37:45 +1000
Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 09:37:44 +1000 (EST)
From: Charlie ROOT <root@bonsai.its.utas.edu.au>
To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ip masquerading
In-Reply-To: <199605191301.NAA15874@kalypso.iqm.unicamp.br>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960520093243.8015A-100000@bonsai.its.utas.edu.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

Sorry to stick an uneducated oar in the water but where does something 
like SLiRP fit in to all this?

 According to the documentation <http://peak.usa1.com/slirp/slirp.doc.txt>
SLiRP allows you to connect a network of hosts to the internet without needing
globablly unique numbers (ie you can use 10.0.2.xxx for your hosts).

Dose this contravene the rfcs?

Andrew