Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 23:54:10 +0100 From: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r243627 - head/sys/kern Message-ID: <50B54492.5040100@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1211272246560.37292@fledge.watson.org> References: <201211272004.qARK4qS8047209@svn.freebsd.org> <CAGE5yCpxOdsjefe6quR_gjs82pk9a2e_H_WUNUWhUGA3WZPJaw@mail.gmail.com> <50B54180.5020608@freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1211272246560.37292@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27.11.2012 23:48, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Andre Oppermann wrote: > >> On 27.11.2012 23:35, Peter Wemm wrote: >>> Andre.. this breaks incoming connections. TCP is immediately reset and never even gets to the >>> listener process. You need to back out of fix this urgently please. >> >> I just found out and fixed it. Sorry for the breakage. > > I'd like to see a much more thorough use of "Reviewed by:" in socket and TCP-related commits -- this > is very sensitive code, and a second pair of eyes is always valuable. Post-commit review is not a > substitute. Looking back over similar changes in the socket code over the last two years, I see > that almost all have reviewers, so I think it would be reasonable to consider it mandatory for these > subsystems at this point. The good news is that we have lots of people with expertise in it. Good to see you becoming more active again. :-) And yes, you have a point there. -- Andre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50B54492.5040100>