From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 27 19:33:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CCF1065686 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:33:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from www.sonnenberger.org (www.ostsee-abc.de [62.206.222.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31688FC0C for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:33:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from britannica.bec.de (www.sonnenberger.org [192.168.1.10]) by www.sonnenberger.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6F26674D; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:33:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by britannica.bec.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 30D4D1BDCD5; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:33:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:33:26 +0200 From: Joerg Sonnenberger To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090427193326.GA7654@britannica.bec.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org References: <20090427183836.GA10793@zim.MIT.EDU> <49F5FE45.2090101@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49F5FE45.2090101@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Cc: Subject: Re: SoC 2009: BSD-licensed libiconv in base system X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:33:24 -0000 On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:49:41AM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > David Schultz wrote: >> ... whether it would make more sense to standardize on something like >> UCS-4 for the internal representation. > > YES. Without this, wchar_t is useless. I strongly disagree. Everything can be represented as UCS-4 is a bad assumption, but something Americans and Europeans naturally don't have to care about. Joerg