From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 17 05:32:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3994D16A4CE for ; Tue, 17 May 2005 05:32:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5690A43D4C for ; Tue, 17 May 2005 05:32:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nuopus@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1850390wra for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 22:32:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Q7GQv7RYVApO4Cpjnn05DUdIFKsYV98OpZC8gw3eEUuE3HV4ISrCT3f6mqCFz+1kwLTfMQN3xdgv3BDx5r7+5ZIhnDpxpeUyuZI8fsTAP22ZKEiHdNoXiLcBKiZfzCGvsWRSngfnWRyIkUBPz3QXi3T9USUEjY253yonKAX/Hro= Received: by 10.54.41.78 with SMTP id o78mr4145534wro; Mon, 16 May 2005 22:32:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.51.79 with HTTP; Mon, 16 May 2005 22:32:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6695b8f7050516223252079bd7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 22:32:13 -0700 From: Christopher Cox To: "netroot@everyday.com.kh" In-Reply-To: <1116305011.4289767335b89@pop3.telesurf.com.kh> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20050517042757.37AD216A4DC@hub.freebsd.org> <1116305011.4289767335b89@pop3.telesurf.com.kh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd reseller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Christopher Cox List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 05:32:18 -0000 I assume you are asking the question in the same sense that Microsoft has= =20 2000 for workstations and 2000 Server for servers. FreeBSD does not have a= =20 separate workstatio and server software ... it is all in the way you=20 configure it and what software you have installed. That being said, there are multiple versions of BSD. FreeBSD and OpenBSD.= =20 OpenBSD focusses more on security, but both can be run as a server or=20 workstation. Linux is the same way. For example, although Ubuntu Linux is geared for the= =20 desktop user, you can always install all of the necessary software to turn= =20 it into a server and remove all of the user end stuff. Selling a seperate workstation and server is just a way for companies like= =20 microsoft to make extra money on their software. On 5/16/05, netroot@everyday.com.kh wrote: >=20 > i wanna run hosting company with freebsd server where can i find it? >=20 > Quoting freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org: >=20 > > Send freebsd-questions mailing list submissions to > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org > > > > You can reach the person managing the list at > > freebsd-questions-owner@freebsd.org > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of freebsd-questions digest..." > > > > > > Today's Topics: > > > > 1. php/apache/ssl core dumps (Ruben Bloemgarten) > > 2. Re: Alright you primitive screwheads, LISTEN UP!! > > (greg@grokking.org) > > 3. tetex, latex, dvips (Florian Hengstberger) > > 4. Re: Alright you primitive screwheads, LISTEN UP!! > > (greg@grokking.org) > > 5. Re: tetex, latex, dvips (Roland Smith) > > 6. Re: tetex, latex, dvips (Florian Hengstberger) > > 7. Re: tetex, latex, dvips (Lowell Gilbert) > > 8. Re: Epson Stylus C86 Printer (Lowell Gilbert) > > 9. Re: tetex, latex, dvips (Roland Smith) > > 10. Re: Epson Stylus C86 Printer (Chris Hodgins) > > 11. Re: daily log reports (Danny Howard) > > 12. Re: A litte more help with creating a freebsd partition on an > > external usbdrive (Lowell Gilbert) > > 13. Re: make depend error in kernel config (Warren) > > 14. Re: FreeBSD or NetBSD on older hardware (MMX) (RW) > > 15. volume problems with snd_via8233 (vaida bogdan) > > 16. AVerMedia AVerTV GO 007 FM Plus card not detected (vaida bogdan) > > 17. Re: IPSec and Racoon between 5.4 and 4.11 (Mike Tancsa) > > 18. Re: FreeBSD or NetBSD on older hardware (MMX) (Joel) > > 19. Re: silencing the boot beep (Eric Schuele) > > 20. Re: FreeBSD or NetBSD on older hardware (MMX) > > (wmc2004aug@bellsouth.net) > > 21. (SOLVED)Re: A litte more help with creating a freebsd > > partition on an external usbdrive (Steve) > > 22. (SOLVED)Re: A litte more help with creating a freebsd > > partition on an external usbdrive (Steve) > > 23. Ethernet over FireWire: How? (Rob) > > 24. Re: FreeBSD or NetBSD on older hardware (MMX) (Joel) > > 25. Re: Ethernet over FireWire: How? (Olivier Nicole) > > 26. Re: Ethernet over FireWire: How? (Rob) > > 27. Re: Ethernet over FireWire: How? (Joel) > > 28. Re: running FreeBSD 4.11 or 5.4 on a SBC (Joel) > > 29. dual-homed gateway: polling & no-polling LANs combined. OK? (Rob) > > 30. Re: How to use snapshots (Joel) > > 31. Re: is this a possible DoS attack? (Joel) > > 32. changing from dhcp to static ip, changing hostname, etc. (Bagus) > > 33. Re: changing from dhcp to static ip, changing hostname, etc. > > (Olivier Nicole) > > 34. Re: changing from dhcp to static ip, changing hostname, etc. > > (Jos? de Paula Rodrigues) > > 35. Re: changing from dhcp to static ip, changing hostname, etc. > > (Jos? de Paula Rodrigues) > > 36. The availability of socketbits.h? (Xu Qiang) > > 37. Re: changing from dhcp to static ip, changing hostname, etc. > > (Foo Ji-Haw) > > 38. Re: Ethernet over FireWire: How? (Ed Stover) > > 39. Re: changing from dhcp to static ip, changing hostname, etc. > > (Jos? de Paula Rodrigues) > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Message: 1 > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 22:55:44 +0200 > > From: "Ruben Bloemgarten" > > Subject: php/apache/ssl core dumps > > To: > > Message-ID: <20050516205530.117E343D9E@mx1.FreeBSD.org> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"windows-1250" > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I'm trying to get Apache to work with both ssl and php. However, when= =20 > ssl > > apache and php are installed and the php module is set to be loaded int= o > > apache, apache core dumps (11). I'm using the latest ports tree. Also= =20 > I've > > tried any number of combinations of mod_php, php-extensions, > > apache13-mod_ssl, apache13-ssl, apache then openssl etc etc. This=20 > problem > > has been discussed before but none of the solutions seem to be working. > > Could anyone help ? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Ruben > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.10 - Release Date: 05/13/2005 > > > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.10 - Release Date: 05/13/2005 > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 2 > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 13:55:55 -0700 > > From: "greg@grokking.org" > > Subject: Re: Alright you primitive screwheads, LISTEN UP!! > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <428908DB.4090606@grokking.org> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1 > > > > Bill Paul wrote: > > > Ok everyone, PAY ATTENTION! Drop whatevery your doing for the next > > > five minutes and READ THIS!! > > > > > > You see that header on this e-mail? You see the "From:" line? Go and > > > read it to yourself. Read the name. Say it to yourself, out loud. > > > > > > No no, go back and do it again. > > > > > > Again! > > > > > > You see what is says? It says "Bill Paul." It does=20 > *********NOT********* > > > say "Paul Bill," does it now. WELL DOES IT!!?!?! > > > > > > No, it damn well doesn't! And yet, for some incomprehensible reason. > > > the majority of you nitwits seem to think it does!!!!!! > > > > > > Get this through your miserable little heads: my first name is BILL!!= ! > > > Understand that? Bill! BEE EYE ELL ELL!!! > > > > > > ____ _____ _ _ _ _ > > > | _ \ |_ _| | | | | | | | | > > > | |_) | | | | | | | | | | | > > > | _ < | | | | | | | | | | > > > | |_) | _| |_ | |____ | |____ |_| |_| > > > |____/ |_____| |______| |______| (_) (_) > > > > > > > > > I can carve it into your skull with a rusty railroad spike if that > > > would make it easier to remember! > > > > > > Do **************NOT*************** send me e-mails opening with > > > "Dear Paul!" That is _NOT_ my name! I don't care if you don't speak > > > english as a first language, are distracted, tired, confused, retarde= d > > > or the President of the United States: if you can't manage to scrape > > > together enough neurons to correctly choose which one of two lousy > > > syllables to use when addressing me, then I would rather never hear > > > from you at all!!!!!! > > > > > > I am not kidding around here! I've been beating my brains out for > > > you rotten bastards for ten lousy years, and after all that time > > > I expect you to at least do me the courtesty of GETTING MY STUPID > > > NAME RIGHT!!!!! > > > > > > This crap has been going on for years. It ends now. Anybody who's > > > dumb enough to send me an e-mail addressed to "Paul" instead of "Bill= " > > > will be permanently banned from my inbox. I don't care if you're on > > > fire and need me to put you out: you will become persona non grata > > > and you will stay that way. Furthermore, anybody who screws up and > > > gets my name wrong in person will quickly find themselves beaten, > > > ground into a fine powder and sprinkled over Richard Stallman's > > > oatmeal!!! > > > > > > And no, I don't want to hear your lousy comments on the matter! > > > Don't follow up!! Don't reply!! Just nod quietly and DON'T MAKE THIS > > > MISTAKE AGAIN!!!! > > > > > > -Bill <------------ SEE!!! LOOK!!! IT'S RIGHT THERE!!!!! IDIOTS!!!!! > > > > > > > > > So...Paul...did you have a question regarding FreeBSD? :) > > [ducks and runs for cover] > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 3 > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 23:11:22 +0200 > > From: "Florian Hengstberger" > > Subject: tetex, latex, dvips > > To: FreeBSD mailinglist > > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"iso-8859-1" > > > > Hi! > > > > Why do latex and tetex conflict? > > Firstly I installed latex but couldnt find the koma package > > but all tools (dvips, xdvi ...). > > So I removed latex and installed tetex-base and tetex-texmf. > > Koma works fine, but I can only produce pdf with pdflatex. > > dvips is not present and xdvi tells me that there are a lot of > > fonts missing! When I try to install dvips I get the following > > message: > > > > =3D=3D=3D> Installing for dvips-5.76 > > > > =3D=3D=3D> dvips-5.76 conflicts with installed package(s): > > teTeX-base-2.0.2_2 > > teTeX-texmf-2.0.2 > > > > They install files into the same place. > > Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/dvips. > > > > How can a tex distribution conflict with and dvi to ps > > converter??? > > Am I doing something completly wrong? > > > > Thanks a lot, > > Florian > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 4 > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 14:20:51 -0700 > > From: "greg@grokking.org" > > Subject: Re: Alright you primitive screwheads, LISTEN UP!! > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <42890EB3.7080500@grokking.org> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1 > > > > greg@grokking.org wrote: > > > Bill Paul wrote: > > > > > >>Ok everyone, PAY ATTENTION! Drop whatevery your doing for the next > > >>five minutes and READ THIS!! > > >> > > >>You see that header on this e-mail? You see the "From:" line? Go and > > >>read it to yourself. Read the name. Say it to yourself, out loud. > > >> > > >>No no, go back and do it again. > > >> > > >>Again! > > >> > > >>You see what is says? It says "Bill Paul." It does=20 > *********NOT********* > > >>say "Paul Bill," does it now. WELL DOES IT!!?!?! > > >> > > >>No, it damn well doesn't! And yet, for some incomprehensible reason. > > >>the majority of you nitwits seem to think it does!!!!!! > > >> > > >>Get this through your miserable little heads: my first name is BILL!!= ! > > >>Understand that? Bill! BEE EYE ELL ELL!!! > > >> > > >> ____ _____ _ _ _ _ > > >> | _ \ |_ _| | | | | | | | | > > >> | |_) | | | | | | | | | | | > > >> | _ < | | | | | | | | | | > > >> | |_) | _| |_ | |____ | |____ |_| |_| > > >> |____/ |_____| |______| |______| (_) (_) > > >> > > >> > > >>I can carve it into your skull with a rusty railroad spike if that > > >>would make it easier to remember! > > >> > > >>Do **************NOT*************** send me e-mails opening with > > >>"Dear Paul!" That is _NOT_ my name! I don't care if you don't speak > > >>english as a first language, are distracted, tired, confused, retarde= d > > >>or the President of the United States: if you can't manage to scrape > > >>together enough neurons to correctly choose which one of two lousy > > >>syllables to use when addressing me, then I would rather never hear > > >>from you at all!!!!!! > > >> > > >>I am not kidding around here! I've been beating my brains out for > > >>you rotten bastards for ten lousy years, and after all that time > > >>I expect you to at least do me the courtesty of GETTING MY STUPID > > >>NAME RIGHT!!!!! > > >> > > >>This crap has been going on for years. It ends now. Anybody who's > > >>dumb enough to send me an e-mail addressed to "Paul" instead of "Bill= " > > >>will be permanently banned from my inbox. I don't care if you're on > > >>fire and need me to put you out: you will become persona non grata > > >>and you will stay that way. Furthermore, anybody who screws up and > > >>gets my name wrong in person will quickly find themselves beaten, > > >>ground into a fine powder and sprinkled over Richard Stallman's > > >>oatmeal!!! > > >> > > >>And no, I don't want to hear your lousy comments on the matter! > > >>Don't follow up!! Don't reply!! Just nod quietly and DON'T MAKE THIS > > >>MISTAKE AGAIN!!!! > > >> > > >>-Bill <------------ SEE!!! LOOK!!! IT'S RIGHT THERE!!!!! IDIOTS!!!!! > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > So...Paul...did you have a question regarding FreeBSD? :) > > > [ducks and runs for cover] > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Oops...sorry folks -- wrong list! > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 5 > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 23:25:44 +0200 > > From: Roland Smith > > Subject: Re: tetex, latex, dvips > > To: FreeBSD mailinglist > > Cc: Florian Hengstberger > > Message-ID: <20050516212544.GA1539@slackbox.xs4all.nl> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:11:22PM +0200, Florian Hengstberger wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > Why do latex and tetex conflict? > > > Firstly I installed latex but couldnt find the koma package > > > but all tools (dvips, xdvi ...). > > > So I removed latex and installed tetex-base and tetex-texmf. > > > Koma works fine, but I can only produce pdf with pdflatex. > > > dvips is not present and xdvi tells me that there are a lot of > > > fonts missing! When I try to install dvips I get the following > > > message: > > > > Try to get a hold of a TeXLive CD. It does not install via a port, but > > it is the most complete TeX distribution out there. Most TUGs hand them > > out to members for free, but I think you can also buy them, e.g. at the > > Lehmanns bookstore. > > > > Roland > > -- > > R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain= =20 > text. > > public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt > > -------------- next part -------------- > > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > > Name: not available > > Type: application/pgp-signature > > Size: 187 bytes > > Desc: not available > > Url : > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd- > questions/attachments/20050516/c7245b2a/attachment-0001.bin > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 6 > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 23:31:08 +0200 > > From: "Florian Hengstberger" > > Subject: Re: tetex, latex, dvips > > To: Roland Smith , "FreeBSD mailinglist" > > > > Cc: Florian Hengstberger > > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"iso-8859-1" > > > > A tex live-cd? I wonder why this should be preferable to a port. > > Anyway what's wrong with the latex port. > > Is this port still maintained, I've read that tetex will be the > > standard tex port in future. > > But how to go the standard latex, xdvi, dvips way without > > dvips? > > Finally what about latex3e if the've finished their work?? > > > > Thanks Florian > > > > > > Roland Smith schrieb: > > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:11:22PM +0200, Florian Hengstberger wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > Why do latex and tetex conflict? > > > > Firstly I installed latex but couldnt find the koma package > > > > but all tools (dvips, xdvi ...). > > > > So I removed latex and installed tetex-base and tetex-texmf. > > > > Koma works fine, but I can only produce pdf with pdflatex. > > > > dvips is not present and xdvi tells me that there are a lot of > > > > fonts missing! When I try to install dvips I get the following > > > > message: > > > > > > Try to get a hold of a TeXLive CD. It does not install via a port, bu= t > > > it is the most complete TeX distribution out there. Most TUGs hand=20 > them > > > out to members for free, but I think you can also buy them, e.g. at= =20 > the > > > Lehmanns bookstore. > > > > > > Roland > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 7 > > Date: 16 May 2005 17:43:23 -0400 > > From: Lowell Gilbert > > Subject: Re: tetex, latex, dvips > > To: "Florian Hengstberger" > > Cc: FreeBSD mailinglist > > Message-ID: <44psvq26f8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii > > > > "Florian Hengstberger" writes: > > > > > Why do latex and tetex conflict? > > > > Because both of them try to install /usr/local/bin/latex (et. al.). > > > > > fonts missing! When I try to install dvips I get the following > > > message: > > > > > > =3D=3D=3D> Installing for dvips-5.76 > > > > > > =3D=3D=3D> dvips-5.76 conflicts with installed package(s): > > > teTeX-base-2.0.2_2 > > > teTeX-texmf-2.0.2 > > > > > > They install files into the same place. > > > Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/dvips. > > > > > > How can a tex distribution conflict with and dvi to ps > > > converter??? > > > > Because they install files into the same place. If you're interested > > in which ones, look at the pkg_plist files. > > > > Try installing print/dvipsk-tetex. > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 8 > > Date: 16 May 2005 17:49:28 -0400 > > From: Lowell Gilbert > > Subject: Re: Epson Stylus C86 Printer > > To: Mike Jeays > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <44ll6e2653.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii > > > > Mike Jeays writes: > > > > > I have just bought one of these printers, and am having trouble=20 > getting > > > it to work with ghostscript. It is connected via a USB port, and it > > > responds momentarily when I send anything directly to /dev/ulpt0. > > > > > > I would appreciate the correct parameters for ghostscript - I think i= t > > > should work with device ijs and 'server' ijsgimpprint, which has been > > > installed in /usr/local/bin. > > > > > > Some of the instructions recommend CUPS and FooMatic, and seem much= =20 > more > > > complicated than I ought to need for a local installation. > > > > > > I tested the printer with Windows, and it does work. > > > > You haven't mentioned what kind of problems you're having. > > > > Personally, I use apsfilter, which I find makes life very easy... > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 9 > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 23:55:44 +0200 > > From: Roland Smith > > Subject: Re: tetex, latex, dvips > > To: Florian Hengstberger > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <20050516215544.GA1693@slackbox.xs4all.nl> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:31:08PM +0200, Florian Hengstberger wrote: > > > A tex live-cd? I wonder why this should be preferable to a port. > > > > TeXLive is a TeX distribution that you can install. I think it also > > includes a live-cd. > > > > > Anyway what's wrong with the latex port. > > > > TeXLive contains more packages and they are better integrated. It uses > > Type1 or TrueType fonts for almost all font families. > > > > > But how to go the standard latex, xdvi, dvips way without > > > dvips? > > > > Like it or not, pdf(La)TeX is more and more becoming the standard. Xpdf > > is fine for viewing pdfs, and runs on more platforms than acrobat. > > > > > Finally what about latex3e if the've finished their work?? > > > > LaTeX3 (if it is ever finished) will be integrated into the different > > distributions. OTOH, even Leslie Lamport seems to think that LaTeX will > > fall into disuse in about five years. The consensus seems to be that > > ConTeXt > > is the most modern TeX macro package. > > > > Roland > > -- > > R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain= =20 > text. > > public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt > > -------------- next part -------------- > > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > > Name: not available > > Type: application/pgp-signature > > Size: 187 bytes > > Desc: not available > > Url : > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd- > questions/attachments/20050516/e570a80d/attachment-0001.bin > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 10 > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 23:02:56 +0100 > > From: Chris Hodgins > > Subject: Re: Epson Stylus C86 Printer > > To: Mike Jeays > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <63c3899e050516150228922b3c@mail.gmail.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1 > > > > On 5/16/05, Mike Jeays wrote: > > > I have just bought one of these printers, and am having trouble=20 > getting > > > it to work with ghostscript. It is connected via a USB port, and it > > > responds momentarily when I send anything directly to /dev/ulpt0. > > > > > > I would appreciate the correct parameters for ghostscript - I think i= t > > > should work with device ijs and 'server' ijsgimpprint, which has been > > > installed in /usr/local/bin. > > > > > > Some of the instructions recommend CUPS and FooMatic, and seem much= =20 > more > > > complicated than I ought to need for a local installation. > > > > > > I tested the printer with Windows, and it does work. > > > > > > > Install cups. > > Install gimp-print with "WITH_CUPS" defined. > > Turn on your printer and make sure the USB cable is in. > > Start cups. > > Browse to localhost:631 and go to the add printer section. > > Add a USB printer and if you installed gimp-print with cups support > > you should be able to choose the correct printer from the list. > > > > Happy Printing. :) > > Chris > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 11 > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 15:09:18 -0700 > > From: Danny Howard > > Subject: Re: daily log reports > > To: "parachute@optonline.net" > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <42891A0E.4050403@toldme.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1; format=3Dflowed > > > > parachute@optonline.net wrote: > > > > > That is not my IP address or what is assigned, i was just using it > > > for simplicity... > > > > > > How can I change the address it sends mail to? I rather change it to > > > root@localhost instead or root@domain.tld. I can probably do that by > > > changing /etc/aliases but it's strange since I didn't need to do this > > > in 5.3 > > > > Well, ahem, the default MTA is Sendmail ... so, this is kind of a > > postfix question, yes? > > > > I'd say "make reinstall" Postfix and be sure you answer "yes" to the > > mailer.conf question. > > > > Also, check /usr/local/etc/portfix/aliases. > > > > -d > > > > -- > > http://dannyman.toldme.com/ > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 12 > > Date: 16 May 2005 19:54:41 -0400 > > From: Lowell Gilbert > > Subject: Re: A litte more help with creating a freebsd partition on an > > external usbdrive > > To: "steve" > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <44ekc6rake.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii > > > > "steve" writes: > > > > > This is a follow-up to my earlier question on how to create a freebsd > > > partition on a usbdrive. I followed these instructions: > > > > >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/formatting-media/x163= .ht > > > ml And was able to create a 111 gig freebsd partition on the usb hard > > > drive, with label da0s1d and /mnt/usbdrive as it's mount point. > > > However, when I try to: > > > ># mount /dev/da0s1d /mnt/usbdrive > > > > > > I get the error: > > > ># mount: /dev/da0s1d: no such file or directory > > > > > > In /dev I see an entry for da0s1 and da0s1c but no entry for > > > da0s1d. Any help in determining what I have missed? Steve > > > > You say you were able to create it as da0s1d; how do you *know* you > > were able to do that. It doesn't look as though you did. Are there > > *any* /dev/da* devices? > > > > What if you rescan the USB bus? > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 13 > > Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 09:58:43 +1000 > > From: Warren > > Subject: Re: make depend error in kernel config > > To: Lowell Gilbert > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <200505170958.44648.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"iso-8859-1" > > > > On Tue, 17 May 2005 4:55 am, you wrote: > > > Warren writes: > > > > Up untill 1 week ago i have been able to compile my kernel perfectl= y > > > > fine. However after running a CVSUP i am no longer able to compile= =20 > my > > > > kernel and i have not changed anything it since i did it quite a fe= w > > > > mnths ago. I do not have sound loaded in my kernel anywhere but=20 > rather > > in > > > > a different spot where it seems to be loading and working perfectly > > fine. > > > > Any assistance would be greatful. > > > > > > > "make depend" on that kernel configuration works for me... > > > Maybe you need to clean your build directory? > > > > > > ironically i tried that and it didnt work, however i tried it again and= =20 > by > > miracle it actually allowed me to build the kernel no errors. Thnxs for= =20 > the > > > > help. > > -- > > Yours Sincerely > > Shinjii > > http://www.shinji.nq.nu > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 14 > > Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 01:13:19 +0100 > > From: RW > > Subject: Re: FreeBSD or NetBSD on older hardware (MMX) > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <200505170113.19514.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"iso-8859-1" > > > > On Monday 16 May 2005 18:02, FreeBSD MailingLists wrote: > > > I fished out an old laptop out of my closet. > > > It is a Pentium 233 MMX w/ 64MB Ram and 12G HD > > > I am thinking about setting up a small station for browsing the web. > > > Which would perform better on such a system? FreeBSD or NetBSD? > > > > > > NetBSD prioritises portability over performance, FreeBSD generally has= =20 > better > > > > application and hardware support on a smaller set of platforms, so=20 > FreeBSD is > > > > the obvious choice. > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 15 > > Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 00:44:01 +0000 > > From: vaida bogdan > > Subject: volume problems with snd_via8233 > > To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <12848a3b0505161744493e5343@mail.gmail.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1 > > > > Hi, I've bought a new computer with an ASRock K7Upgrade-880 > > motherboard with 5.1 channels AC'97 Audio (quoting from install guide > > and I have a problem with sound on Freebsd 5.4 with snd_via8233. > > > > After I load the module, the sound volume is set to max and even > > though I can lower the sound bar (xmms) or lower the volume in > > mplayer or even mixer, the volume doesn't change. I can only change it > > from my audio boxes. > > > > I think it could be a module problem because it works ok in windows. > > > > # cat /dev/sndstat > > FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) > > Installed devices: > > pcm0: at io 0xd000 irq 22 kld snd_via8233 (5p/1r/0v > > channels duplex default) > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 16 > > Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 00:45:31 +0000 > > From: vaida bogdan > > Subject: AVerMedia AVerTV GO 007 FM Plus card not detected > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <12848a3b05051617453b2bf0a@mail.gmail.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1 > > > > I used the handbook instructions: > > > > bktr_load=3D"YES" to loader.conf > > +/- hw.bt848.tuner=3D6 in sysctl.conf > > > > bktr man page tells me my tuner is supported, yet dmesg's output shows > > only: > > > > bktr_mem: memory holder loaded > > > > I also tried compilling it in the kernel (by the manual) with no=20 > success. > > > > This is the first time I tried using a tvtuner on fbsd so I could have > > got smthg wrong. Any help would be appreciated. > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 17 > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 20:56:47 -0400 > > From: Mike Tancsa > > Subject: Re: IPSec and Racoon between 5.4 and 4.11 > > To: Daren Russell > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <23gi81pattnnan1rlv8uc0dva1ken5r8cj@4ax.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii > > > > On Mon, 16 May 2005 12:51:50 +0100, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions > > you wrote: > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >Has anybody got 5.4 <-> 4.11 talking in this config, or does anybody > > >know of any pitfalls because of kernel changes? > > > > There should not be any issues as I have 90+ RELENG4 boxes deployed > > talking to a 5.4 server and a dozen RELENG_5 boxes talking to 2 > > RELENG_4 servers generally with out issue. The one thing we run into > > from time to time is the issue of net.key.prefered_oldsa=3D1 on > > FAST_IPSEC on RELENG_4. But other than that, it works. What issues > > are you running into ? Did you enable debug logging in racoon ? What > > state do the tunnels get to ? i.e what does setkey -D show ? > > > > ---Mike > > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Mike Tancsa, Sentex communications http://www.sentex.net > > Providing Internet Access since 1994 > > mike@sentex.net, (http://www.tancsa.com) > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 18 > > Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 10:36:22 +0900 > > From: Joel > > Subject: Re: FreeBSD or NetBSD on older hardware (MMX) > > To: FreeBSD MailingLists , questions > > > > Message-ID: <20050517103300.2930.REES@ddcom.co.jp> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"ISO-2022-JP" > > > > On Mon, 16 May 2005 14:03:18 -0400 > > Tomas Quintero wrote > > > > > On 5/16/05, FreeBSD MailingLists wrote: > > > > I fished out an old laptop out of my closet. > > > > It is a Pentium 233 MMX w/ 64MB Ram and 12G HD > > > > I am thinking about setting up a small station for browsing the web= . > > > > Which would perform better on such a system? FreeBSD or NetBSD? > > > > > > > > I know that this is a mailing list for FreeBSD users, but I am=20 > hoping > > > > that you will be objective and give me a suggestion based purely on > > > > performance. > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > Tomoki Taniguchi > > > > > > Hell, put Windows NT4 on it. It's all the same. If you're not doing > > > anything special on it, it doesn't really matter imo. > > > > Say what? > > > > NT4 for browsing the web? With known vulnerabilities and no maintenance= ? > > > > Be civil. > > > > -- > > Joel Rees > > digitcom, inc. =1B$B3t<02q > Kobe, Japan +81-78-672-8800 > > ** ** > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 19 > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 20:38:11 -0500 > > From: Eric Schuele > > Subject: Re: silencing the boot beep > > To: Lowell Gilbert > > Cc: FreeBSD Questions > > Message-ID: <42894B03.8080105@computer.org> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii; format=3Dflowed > > > > Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > > Eric Schuele writes: > > > > > > > > >>Allan Bowhill wrote: > > >> > > >>>Does anyone know how to turn off the annoying beep when BSD > > >>>partition selector comes up? > > >> > > >>Wish I knew... I could use this as well. > > > > > > > > > You could modify your sources to remove it. > > > Pretty simple; just remove the putchr (line 205 of boot0.S). > > > > > > > OK... Thanks. I'll give it a try. > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Eric > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 20 > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 22:00:56 -0400 > > From: wmc2004aug@bellsouth.net > > Subject: Re: FreeBSD or NetBSD on older hardware (MMX) > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <6.0.1.1.2.20050516215636.02a1c380@mailsvr.xxiii.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii"; format=3Dflowed > > > > At 09:36 PM 5/16/2005, you wrote: > > >... It is a Pentium 233 MMX w/ 64MB Ram and 12G HD ... > > >... Which would perform better on such a system? FreeBSD or NetBSD? > > > > I have a system with nearly identical specs that runs DNS and some othe= r > > minor services on our external network. While I can't comment on NetBSD= ,=20 > I > > > > would suggest that with FreeBSD in that little memory, you should take= =20 > the > > time to configure and compile a stripped-down kernel. It saves 5 or 6 M= B > > of ram on mine (ie: a good chuck of 64MB!) > > > > -Wayne > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 21 > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 22:11:18 -0400 > > From: Steve > > Subject: (SOLVED)Re: A litte more help with creating a freebsd > > partition on an external usbdrive > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: > > <6.2.1.2.0.20050516220806.0276a350@mail.digitalbluesky.net> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii"; format=3Dflowed > > > > > > I went back and tried the whole partitioning process again following th= e > > instructions EXACTLY as laid out in section 16.3.1 of the FreeBSD=20 > handbook > > and it worked this time. > > > > Thanks to everyone who offered suggestions. > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > At 07:54 PM 5/16/2005, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > >"steve" writes: > > > > > > > This is a follow-up to my earlier question on how to create a=20 > freebsd > > > > partition on a usbdrive. I followed these instructions: > > > > > > > > >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/formatting-media/x163= .ht > > > > ml And was able to create a 111 gig freebsd partition on the usb=20 > hard > > > > drive, with label da0s1d and /mnt/usbdrive as it's mount point. > > > > However, when I try to: > > > > ># mount /dev/da0s1d /mnt/usbdrive > > > > > > > > I get the error: > > > > ># mount: /dev/da0s1d: no such file or directory > > > > > > > > In /dev I see an entry for da0s1 and da0s1c but no entry for > > > > da0s1d. Any help in determining what I have missed? Steve > > > > > >You say you were able to create it as da0s1d; how do you *know* you > > >were able to do that. It doesn't look as though you did. Are there > > >*any* /dev/da* devices? > > > > > >What if you rescan the USB bus? > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 22 > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 22:11:18 -0400 > > From: Steve > > Subject: (SOLVED)Re: A litte more help with creating a freebsd > > partition on an external usbdrive > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: > > <6.2.1.2.0.20050516220806.0276a350@mail.digitalbluesky.net> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii"; format=3Dflowed > > > > > > I went back and tried the whole partitioning process again following th= e > > instructions EXACTLY as laid out in section 16.3.1 of the FreeBSD=20 > handbook > > and it worked this time. > > > > Thanks to everyone who offered suggestions. > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > At 07:54 PM 5/16/2005, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > >"steve" writes: > > > > > > > This is a follow-up to my earlier question on how to create a=20 > freebsd > > > > partition on a usbdrive. I followed these instructions: > > > > > > > > >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/formatting-media/x163= .ht > > > > ml And was able to create a 111 gig freebsd partition on the usb=20 > hard > > > > drive, with label da0s1d and /mnt/usbdrive as it's mount point. > > > > However, when I try to: > > > > ># mount /dev/da0s1d /mnt/usbdrive > > > > > > > > I get the error: > > > > ># mount: /dev/da0s1d: no such file or directory > > > > > > > > In /dev I see an entry for da0s1 and da0s1c but no entry for > > > > da0s1d. Any help in determining what I have missed? Steve > > > > > >You say you were able to create it as da0s1d; how do you *know* you > > >were able to do that. It doesn't look as though you did. Are there > > >*any* /dev/da* devices? > > > > > >What if you rescan the USB bus? > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 23 > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 19:32:24 -0700 (PDT) > > From: Rob > > Subject: Ethernet over FireWire: How? > > To: FreeBSD questions > > Message-ID: <20050517023224.71177.qmail@web54006.mail.yahoo.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii > > > > > > Hi, > > > > My lab bought a new computer, which I have to > > configure as a dual-homed/gateway, sambaserver, > > http-server, etc. This I know how to do. > > I'm using 5.4-RELEASE for this computer. > > > > Among many things 'built-in' on the motherboard, > > it has this also built-in: > > skc0: Marvell Yukon Lite Gigabit Ethernet > > firewire0: on fwohci0 > > fwe0: > > > > (these lines are from dmesg output) > > > > The 'skc0' has the regular ethernet socket (RJ-45 > > connector), so I can use that as one ethernet > > connection. > > > > Can I use the firewire/ethernet as the second > > ethernet card on this computer. If yes, how? > > I'm not at all familiar with firewire stuff. > > The lines in the dmesg output actually triggered > > this question. > > > > Can someone give me a layman's answer to how I can > > use the firewire as the second ethernet card? > > The backside of the computer has a socket labeled > > '1394', but this is not a RJ-45 connector. Do I > > need a converter cable from firewire to RJ-45? > > > > BTW: what are the advantages and disadvantages of > > using this firewire thing as ethernet device? > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > Rob. > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 24 > > Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 11:39:40 +0900 > > From: Joel > > Subject: Re: FreeBSD or NetBSD on older hardware (MMX) > > To: questions > > Message-ID: <20050517103652.2933.REES@ddcom.co.jp> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"ISO-2022-JP" > > > > On Tue, 17 May 2005 01:02:42 +0800 > > FreeBSD MailingLists wrote > > > > > I fished out an old laptop out of my closet. > > > It is a Pentium 233 MMX w/ 64MB Ram and 12G HD > > > I am thinking about setting up a small station for browsing the web. > > > Which would perform better on such a system? FreeBSD or NetBSD? > > > > > > I know that this is a mailing list for FreeBSD users, but I am hoping > > > that you will be objective and give me a suggestion based purely on > > > performance. > > > > Performance? Which OS may be the wrong question. > > > > If you want it to browse the web, add RAM. If possible, add 512MB. > > > > I'd ask how much experience you have with the command line. netBSD (and > > openBSD) will require much more work on the command line than freeBSD. > > > > I'd also ask whether you need multibyte text. If so, freeBSD's support > > of locales is better than netBSD's or openBSD's. > > > > I understand that it is possible to get a window manager working with > > only 64 MB of RAM, but you would want to use one of the bare bones, dea= d > > simple ones, _not_ Gnome or KDE. Even if you can raise the RAM to 512= =20 > MB, > > you'll still probably prefer to use a simpler window manager. > > > > If you really know what you are doing, you can get better performance o= n > > small systems with netBSD. But if you knew that much, you wouldn't be > > asking. > > > > Pick one, go for it, expect to learn a lot. As much as possible, avoid > > compiling on a box that slow. Use binary packages when you can. > > > > Expect compiles to take days, not hours. With only 64MB, don't be > > surprised if a moderately large source package takes more than a week t= o > > compile. > > > > -- > > Joel Rees > > digitcom, inc. =1B$B3t<02q > Kobe, Japan +81-78-672-8800 > > ** ** > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 25 > > Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 09:42:47 +0700 (ICT) > > From: Olivier Nicole > > Subject: Re: Ethernet over FireWire: How? > > To: spamrefuse@yahoo.com > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <200505170242.j4H2glVx014970@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> > > > > Hi Rob, > > > > > Can someone give me a layman's answer to how I can > > > use the firewire as the second ethernet card? > > > The backside of the computer has a socket labeled > > > '1394', but this is not a RJ-45 connector. Do I > > > need a converter cable from firewire to RJ-45? > > > > I'd say that "Ethernet over Firewire" is really what it says it is, > > Ethernet is encapsulated in Firewire, so at the other end you also > > need to attach to a "Ethernet over Firewire" device. > > > > Beside, Firewire is much slower than Ethernet I guess. > > > > If you build a router for your lab, I'd recommend that you buy proper > > Ethernet cards, they will prove much more reliable (last longer, > > deliver higher bandwidth, attach nicely to some weird Ethernet > > switches...) than cheap solution like "over Firewire". Is it worth > > saving 50$ on a machine that is supposed to handle a good share of > > your lab infrastructure? > > > > Olivier > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 26 > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 19:48:40 -0700 (PDT) > > From: Rob > > Subject: Re: Ethernet over FireWire: How? > > To: Olivier Nicole > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <20050517024840.93539.qmail@web54004.mail.yahoo.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii > > > > > > --- Olivier Nicole wrote: > > > Hi Rob, > > > > > > > Can someone give me a layman's answer to how I can > > > > use the firewire as the second ethernet card? > > > > The backside of the computer has a socket labeled > > > > '1394', but this is not a RJ-45 connector. Do I > > > > need a converter cable from firewire to RJ-45? > > > > > > I'd say that "Ethernet over Firewire" is really what > > > it says it is, > > > Ethernet is encapsulated in Firewire, so at the > > > other end you also > > > need to attach to a "Ethernet over Firewire" device. > > > > > > Beside, Firewire is much slower than Ethernet I > > > guess. > > > > > > If you build a router for your lab, I'd recommend > > > that you buy proper > > > Ethernet cards, they will prove much more reliable > > > (last longer, > > > deliver higher bandwidth, attach nicely to some > > > weird Ethernet > > > switches...) than cheap solution like "over > > > Firewire". Is it worth > > > saving 50$ on a machine that is supposed to handle a > > > good share of > > > your lab infrastructure? > > > > I had no idea what this firewire stuff was about, > > but in that case I will ignore it and buy another > > decent LAN card. > > Thanks for your explanation. > > > > Rob. > > > > > > > > Discover Yahoo! > > Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing and more. Check it out! > > http://discover.yahoo.com/stayintouch.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 27 > > Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 12:22:50 +0900 > > From: Joel > > Subject: Re: Ethernet over FireWire: How? > > To: FreeBSD questions > > Message-ID: <20050517115242.2936.REES@ddcom.co.jp> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"ISO-2022-JP" > > > > > My lab bought a new computer, which I have to > > > configure as a dual-homed/gateway, sambaserver, > > > http-server, etc. This I know how to do. > > > I'm using 5.4-RELEASE for this computer. > > > > > > Among many things 'built-in' on the motherboard, > > > it has this also built-in: > > > skc0: Marvell Yukon Lite Gigabit Ethernet > > > firewire0: on fwohci0 > > > fwe0: > > > > > > (these lines are from dmesg output) > > > > > > The 'skc0' has the regular ethernet socket (RJ-45 > > > connector), so I can use that as one ethernet > > > connection. > > > > > > Can I use the firewire/ethernet as the second > > > ethernet card on this computer. If yes, how? > > > I'm not at all familiar with firewire stuff. > > > The lines in the dmesg output actually triggered > > > this question. > > > > > > Can someone give me a layman's answer to how I can > > > use the firewire as the second ethernet card? > > > The backside of the computer has a socket labeled > > > '1394', but this is not a RJ-45 connector. > > > > That would be extremely odd if it were an RJ-45. Firewire (IEEE1394) > > uses two or three physical connectors, but none of them are RJ-45. > > > > > Do I > > > need a converter cable from firewire to RJ-45? > > > > You don't really want a converter. The point of ethernet over firewire > > was to allow two computers (or other devices, like high-end video) to > > route ethernet over a firewire cable. > > > > > BTW: what are the advantages and disadvantages of > > > using this firewire thing as ethernet device? > > > > I've seen USB "modems" (telco network to USB), haven't seen any Firewir= e > > modems, which seems a little odd, since USB and IP are not a good fit, > > and since Firewire includes IP over firewire in the standard. I guess > > that's just because iNTEL decided to put USB (an iNTEL technology) into > > their chipsets, so USB is ubiquitous. > > > > Just for fun, I searched on google for "firewire ethernet" and found > > this: > > > > > > > > It may answer some of your questions. > > > > Probably, the only way this would help in your case is if you had two > > boxes with firewire on two separate but physically close networks and > > wanted to use those two boxes as a bridge between the two networks. > > > > -- > > Joel Rees > > digitcom, inc. =1B$B3t<02q > Kobe, Japan +81-78-672-8800 > > ** ** > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 28 > > Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 12:37:17 +0900 > > From: Joel > > Subject: Re: running FreeBSD 4.11 or 5.4 on a SBC > > To: "Freebsd-Questions" > > Message-ID: <20050517122525.293C.REES@ddcom.co.jp> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"ISO-2022-JP" > > > > > I have a need for a Single Board Computer (SBC), something like the > > TS-5600 > > > > > > http://www.embeddedarm.com/epc/ts5600-spec-p.php > > > > > > My requirements are: > > > > > > +100MHz CPU > > > Wireless 802.11b > > > 3 or 4 Serial ports > > > boot from a CF card > > > 8 ch. A/D > > > 2 ch. D/A > > > less than 5 watts of power! > > > > > > is this do-able in FreeBSD? > > > > It has been done. You could probably find something about several such > > projects by searching on your favorite search engine for "sbc freebsd" > > or something similar. > > > > As noted, netbsd, openbsd, and various flavors of Linux have also been > > used in this sort of device with good results. (More terms you might > > want to search on.) > > > > > Since I am on this subject, I was going to use an old P-120=20 > motherboard > > > running with a hard drive for development. > > > Does any one know of a cheep A/D - D/A and DIO PCI card that can be= =20 > used > > > with FreeBSD? > > > > Again, they exist. You'll probably come across such hardware while > > doing the above searches. > > > > > I am hoping to most of the development in C (little as possible, as I= =20 > am > > > just learning C), and shell scripts. > > > > You'll probably find some mailing lists in the process as well, where > > you can get help with this. > > > > Have fun. :-) > > > > -- > > Joel Rees > > digitcom, inc. =1B$B3t<02q > Kobe, Japan +81-78-672-8800 > > ** ** > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 29 > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 20:39:57 -0700 (PDT) > > From: Rob > > Subject: dual-homed gateway: polling & no-polling LANs combined. OK? > > To: FreeBSD questions > > Message-ID: <20050517033957.97192.qmail@web54003.mail.yahoo.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I have a dual-homed gateway, running 5.4 release. > > > > I have one LAN card for which with polling is > > supported, but for the other one it's not. > > > > Is it a good idea to use polling for the one card, > > and leave the other in no-polling state. > > > > Is that OK? Advantages/disadvantages? Recommendations? > > > > Thanks! > > Rob. > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Mail > > Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour: > > http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 30 > > Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 12:46:41 +0900 > > From: Joel > > Subject: Re: How to use snapshots > > To: > > Message-ID: <20050517124310.293F.REES@ddcom.co.jp> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"ISO-2022-JP" > > > > (reformatted, to maintain the thread) > > > > > > > ftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/ looks like > > > > install disc1 > > > > > content. > > > > > > > > > > How or what do I need to run to use this to update my system? > > > > > > > > > > Been to the official handbook with no luck. > > > > > > > > It's exactly like any other install image. > > > > Boot the floppies and do a binary upgrade. > > > > > > I have no idea what you mean by those statements. > > > What floppies are you talking about? > > > What does what you say have to do with system snapshots. > > > > > > How do I download the snapshot version with all the files and > > > sub-directors? > > > > > > This snapshot URL must be a normal thing available to the general > > > FreeBSD user. > > > So there must be some pre-canned way to download and use it. > > > How do I find this out? > > > > Read this whole section: > > > >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cutting-edge.ht= ml > > > > Note, in particular, under the heading > > > > 19.2.2.3 Using FreeBSD-STABLE > > > > -- > > Joel Rees > > digitcom, inc. =1B$B3t<02q > Kobe, Japan +81-78-672-8800 > > ** ** > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 31 > > Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 12:51:34 +0900 > > From: Joel > > Subject: Re: is this a possible DoS attack? > > To: FreeBSD Mailing List > > Message-ID: <20050517124657.2942.REES@ddcom.co.jp> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"ISO-2022-JP" > > > > On Mon, 16 May 2005 08:26:58 -0600 > > "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" wrote > > > [...] > > > May 16 02:20:00 crickhollow named[87025]: zone 22.63.209.in-addr.arpa= / > > > IN: loading master file ptr.209.63.22: file not found > > > May 16 02:33:31 crickhollow /kernel: Limiting icmp unreach response > > > from 232 to 200 packets per second > > > May 16 03:14:52 crickhollow /kernel: All mbufs exhausted, please see > > > tuning(7). > > > May 16 03:14:53 crickhollow last message repeated 3 times > > > May 16 03:14:59 crickhollow /kernel: o 00:20:ed:16:b9:07 on dc0 > > > May 16 03:14:59 crickhollow /kernel: arp: 166.70.252.252moved from > > > 00:20:ed:16:b9:07 to 00:20:ed:56:b9:07 on dc0 > > > May 16 03:14:59 crickhollow /kernel: arp: 166.70.252.252moved from > > > 00:20:ed:56:b9:07 to 00:20:ed:16:b9:07 on dc0 > > > May 16 03:14:59 crickhollow /kernel: arp: 166.70.252.252moved from > > > 00:20:ed:16:b9:07 to 00:20:ed:56:b9:07 on dc0" > > > [...] > > > > NIC in 166.70.252.252 going bad? > > > > Some sort early morning of line noise? (I'd suggest the solar flare, bu= t > > I think that was before the weekend.) > > > > -- > > Joel Rees > > digitcom, inc. =1B$B3t<02q > Kobe, Japan +81-78-672-8800 > > ** ** > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 32 > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 23:11:25 -0500 > > From: "Bagus" > > Subject: changing from dhcp to static ip, changing hostname, etc. > > To: > > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"iso-8859-1" > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm using FreeBsd 5.3 and I'm switching to a static ip, but am not sure= =20 > of > > all the syntax. > > > > If not, here's what I had in my rc.conf. > > hostname=3D"john" > > ifconfig_fxp0=3D"DHCP" > > > > now I'm hoping to have a > > > > hostname of bagus.org > > gateway of 204.251.1.185 > > ip address of 204.251.1.186 > > netmask of 255.255.255.248 > > > > I'm guessing I need to change my resolve.conf, too. what does the=20 > 'search' > > line in there do? > > > > Any other considerations? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Bagus > > > > p.s. I can't for the life of me find a simple > > how-to-get-your-freebsd-box-online guide. The handbook seems to only=20 > have > > "11.3 Core Configuration" which has a little bit about cluster > > configurations. What's up with that? I just want to get one box online! > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 33 > > Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 11:07:45 +0700 (ICT) > > From: Olivier Nicole > > Subject: Re: changing from dhcp to static ip, changing hostname, etc. > > To: bagus@cox.net > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <200505170407.j4H47jFr070180@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> > > > > > now I'm hoping to have a > > > > > > hostname of bagus.org > > > gateway of 204.251.1.185 > > > ip address of 204.251.1.186 > > > netmask of 255.255.255.248 > > > > > > in /etc/rc.conf > > > > ifconfig_fxp0=3D"inet 204.251.1.186 netmask=20 > 255.255.255.248 " > > defaultrouter=3D"204.251.1.185 " > > hostname=3D"bagus.org " > > > > in /etc/resolv.conf > > > > dunno, what do you expect to have? > > > > olivier > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 34 > > Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 01:14:33 -0300 > > From: Jos? de Paula Rodrigues > > Subject: Re: changing from dhcp to static ip, changing hostname, etc. > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <5ef8c2f005051621143a9f4076@mail.gmail.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1 > > > > On 5/17/05, Bagus wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm using FreeBsd 5.3 and I'm switching to a static ip, but am not=20 > sure > > of > > > all the syntax. > > > > > > If not, here's what I had in my rc.conf. > > > hostname=3D"john" > > > ifconfig_fxp0=3D"DHCP" > > > > > > now I'm hoping to have a > > > > > > hostname of bagus.org > > > gateway of 204.251.1.185 > > > ip address of 204.251.1.186 > > > netmask of 255.255.255.248 > > > > > > I'm guessing I need to change my resolve.conf, too. what does the > > 'search' > > > line in there do? > > > > > > Any other considerations? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Bagus > > > > > > p.s. I can't for the life of me find a simple > > > how-to-get-your-freebsd-box-online guide. The handbook seems to only= =20 > have > > > "11.3 Core Configuration" which has a little bit about cluster > > > configurations. What's up with that? I just want to get one box=20 > online! > > > > > > > I use the following on my rc.conf: > > > > ifconfig_xl0=3D"inet 192.168.200.8 netmask=20 > 255.255.255.0 " > > defaultrouter=3D"192.168.200.254 " > > hostname=3D"uirapuru.pinguim" > > > > HTH. > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 35 > > Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 01:18:09 -0300 > > From: Jos? de Paula Rodrigues > > Subject: Re: changing from dhcp to static ip, changing hostname, etc. > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <5ef8c2f0050516211870a4f20a@mail.gmail.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1 > > > > I forgot to say, my router is configured as a DNS proxy (probably the > > default in your setup, too), so I put its address on /etc/resolv.conf: > > > > nameserver 192.168.200.254 > > > > "man resolv.conf" should enlighten you about what the "search" option > > does; I don't need it, so my whole resolv.conf file consists of that > > single line above. > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 36 > > Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 12:22:27 +0800 > > From: Xu Qiang > > Subject: The availability of socketbits.h? > > To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org > > Message-ID: <20050517041306.1888E1D92E@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Diso-8859-1 > > > > Hi, all: > > > > I am compiling NNGS (No Name Go Server) code in my FreeBSD 5.3 machine.= =20 > Yet, > > I came across the following error: > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > gcc -traditional-cpp -Wall -DFREEBSD -c network.c > > network.c:23: socketbits.h: No such file or directory > > gmake: *** [network.o] Error 1 > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > > I have searched for this file in my system, but can't find it. > > > > To have it present, which software must I install? > > > > Regards, > > Xu Qiang > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 37 > > Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 12:26:53 +0800 > > From: Foo Ji-Haw > > Subject: Re: changing from dhcp to static ip, changing hostname, etc. > > To: Jos? de Paula Rodrigues > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <4289728D.7070805@nexlabs.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1; format=3Dflowed > > > > This brings to mind a question, I've been wanting to ask: > > > > How does one get the system to read the rc.conf changes without > > rebooting the system? > > > > Jos=E9 de Paula Rodrigues wrote: > > > > >On 5/17/05, Bagus wrote: > > > > > > > > >>Hi, > > >> > > >>I'm using FreeBsd 5.3 and I'm switching to a static ip, but am not=20 > sure > > of > > >>all the syntax. > > >> > > >>If not, here's what I had in my rc.conf. > > >>hostname=3D"john" > > >>ifconfig_fxp0=3D"DHCP" > > >> > > >>now I'm hoping to have a > > >> > > >>hostname of bagus.org > > >>gateway of 204.251.1.185 > > >>ip address of 204.251.1.186 > > >>netmask of 255.255.255.248 > > >> > > >>I'm guessing I need to change my resolve.conf, too. what does the > > 'search' > > >>line in there do? > > >> > > >>Any other considerations? > > >> > > >>Thanks, > > >> > > >>Bagus > > >> > > >>p.s. I can't for the life of me find a simple > > >>how-to-get-your-freebsd-box-online guide. The handbook seems to only= =20 > have > > >>"11.3 Core Configuration" which has a little bit about cluster > > >>configurations. What's up with that? I just want to get one box=20 > online! > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >I use the following on my rc.conf: > > > > > >ifconfig_xl0=3D"inet 192.168.200.8 netmask=20 > 255.255.255.0 " > > >defaultrouter=3D"192.168.200.254 " > > >hostname=3D"uirapuru.pinguim" > > > > > >HTH. > > >_______________________________________________ > > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 38 > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 22:23:49 -0600 > > From: Ed Stover > > Subject: Re: Ethernet over FireWire: How? > > To: Olivier Nicole > > Cc: spamrefuse@yahoo.com > > Message-ID: <428971D5.5080902@nativenerds.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1 > > > > Olivier Nicole wrote: > > > Hi Rob, > > > > > > > > >>Can someone give me a layman's answer to how I can > > >>use the firewire as the second ethernet card? > > >>The backside of the computer has a socket labeled > > >>'1394', but this is not a RJ-45 connector. Do I > > >>need a converter cable from firewire to RJ-45? > > Just drop $15 for another NIC. > > > > > > > > > I'd say that "Ethernet over Firewire" is really what it says it is, > > > Ethernet is encapsulated in Firewire, so at the other end you also > > > need to attach to a "Ethernet over Firewire" device. > > > > > > Beside, Firewire is much slower than Ethernet I guess. > > Firewire is essentially twice as fast as 100baseT and almost as fast as > > 1000baseT (GigaBit) > > > > > > If you build a router for your lab, I'd recommend that you buy proper > > > Ethernet cards, they will prove much more reliable (last longer, > > > deliver higher bandwidth, attach nicely to some weird Ethernet > > > switches...) than cheap solution like "over Firewire". > > "over firewire" is not a cheap solution, actually it will cost you more > > upfront and in the long run then ethernet. > > > Is it worth > > > saving 50$ on a machine that is supposed to handle a good share of > > > your lab infrastructure? > > Remember a decent NIC is $8-$15 .. > > > > > > Olivier > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 39 > > Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 01:27:45 -0300 > > From: Jos? de Paula Rodrigues > > Subject: Re: changing from dhcp to static ip, changing hostname, etc. > > To: Foo Ji-Haw > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <5ef8c2f005051621273774de29@mail.gmail.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1 > > > > On 5/17/05, Foo Ji-Haw wrote: > > > This brings to mind a question, I've been wanting to ask: > > > > > > How does one get the system to read the rc.conf changes without > > > rebooting the system? > > > > > > > Just restart the appropriate service (usually found in /etc/rc.d or > > /usr/local/etc/rc.d). > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > End of freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 96, Issue 31 > > ************************************************* > > >=20 > ------------------------------------------------- > Get your free email account with : > http://www.everyday.com.kh > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 --=20 Christopher Cox nuOpus@gmail.com