From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 14 16:53:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EB916A41F; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:53:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at) Received: from viefep17-int.chello.at (viefep17-int.chello.at [213.46.255.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6017243D46; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:53:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at) Received: from wombat.fafoe.narf.at ([213.47.85.26]) by viefep17-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20050914165314.FJQG1234.viefep17-int.chello.at@wombat.fafoe.narf.at>; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:53:14 +0200 Received: by wombat.fafoe.narf.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 71F9BB7; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:53:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:53:02 +0200 From: Stefan Farfeleder To: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <20050914165300.GG59453@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> References: <200509140901.j8E916mL044612@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050914095217.GC59453@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> <154E8DB1-C941-4477-9FB7-BD373DC11898@xcllnt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <154E8DB1-C941-4477-9FB7-BD373DC11898@xcllnt.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:53:18 -0000 On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:30:26AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Sep 14, 2005, at 2:52 AM, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > > >> Back out 1.247. On ia64 is included from > >>assembler source, > >> the prototype broke buildword. > > > >I waver between guarding the prototype with #ifndef __ASSEMBLER__ and > >moving it to another header, eg. . Opinions? > > I would go with #ifndef __ASSEMBLER__. I think the prototype is > essentially in the right header. I did test your patch and it does > the trick... That would require fixing xorg-server's usage of the header too. I don't know how difficult this is. Stefan