From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Nov 18 18: 0:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from tohokugw.tohoku.iij.ad.jp (tohokugw.tohoku.iij.ad.jp [202.232.14.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 103F514E51 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 18:00:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from taguchi@tohoku.iij.ad.jp) Received: by tohokugw.tohoku.iij.ad.jp; id LAA01831; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 11:00:17 +0900 (JST) Received: from unknown(192.168.144.2) by tohokugw.tohoku.iij.ad.jp via smap (V4.2) id xma001807; Fri, 19 Nov 99 10:59:20 +0900 Received: from hirose.tohoku.iij.ad.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hirose.tohoku.iij.ad.jp (8.9.3/3.7W99092011) with ESMTP id KAA35408 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 10:59:34 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 10:59:33 +0900 Message-ID: <14388.44805.503480.29321F@hirose.tohoku.iij.ad.jp> From: taguchi@tohoku.iij.ad.jp To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCL's plus patches In-Reply-To: In your message of "Thu, 18 Nov 1999 19:38:18 -0500 (EST)" References: <14388.43339.834504.26482Z@hirose.tohoku.iij.ad.jp> User-Agent: Wanderlust/1.0.3 (Notorious) SEMI/1.13.3 (Komaiko) FLIM/1.12.5 (Hirahata) Emacs/20.4 (i386--freebsd) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.13.3 - "Komaiko") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, > If it's backwards compatable like you say it is, I see no reason for > another port. Plus patch documents say: All changes are 100% upwards compatible with the corresponding offical Tcl/Tk releases. And I've already contacted to the auther, Jan Nijtmans. He said there are no probrem if we use/distribute plus patch as ports/packages. Taguchi, Takeshi. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message