From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Aug  7 10:48:00 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA19331
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 10:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from david.siemens.de (david.siemens.de [139.23.36.11])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA19314
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 10:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from salomon.mchp.siemens.de (salomon.siemens.de [139.23.33.13])
	by david.siemens.de (8.8.6/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA12241
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 19:47:53 +0200 (MDT)
Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (daemon@curry.mchp.siemens.de [146.180.31.23])
	by salomon.mchp.siemens.de (8.8.6/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA07253
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 19:47:52 +0200 (MDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.8.6/8.8.6) id TAA26583
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 19:47:51 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Andre Albsmeier <Andre.Albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de>
Message-Id: <199708071747.TAA14597@curry.mchp.siemens.de>
Subject: Suggestion for rc.conf / weak_mountd_authentication
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 19:47:40 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

I would suggest to change weak_mountd_authentication to mountd_flags and
to change rc.network accordingly.

This would be consistent to the rest and would make it possible to use
also -2 for example without having to change rc.network.

What do you think of this?	

	-Andre