From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 26 04:33:23 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D7516A417 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:33:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (vjofn-pt.tunnel.tserv1.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:ffff::5e5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552B413C4AC for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:33:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (cpe-68-175-8-11.hvc.res.rr.com [68.175.8.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l9Q4XGnu098510; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:33:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (localhost.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com [127.0.0.1]) by himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l9Q4XBYY049303; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:33:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: (from tbohml@localhost) by himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l9Q4XBdx049302; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:33:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tbohml) From: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" Message-Id: <200710260433.l9Q4XBdx049302@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> To: davidb@boothscientific.com Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:33:11 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <200710252319.27118.davidb@boothscientific.com> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.0-BETA1.5 Available... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:33:23 -0000 > > On Thursday 25 October 2007, Ken Smith wrote: > > Sorry, I had a bit of a false start with 7.0-BETA1. I've got sets > > of build machines used for the Monthly Snapshots and procedures in > > place to try and minimize the mistakes I could make while doing > > those Snapshots (previously one set for HEAD, one set for > > RELENG_6). The set of machines I'll be using for the 7.0-RELEASE > > build are the ones that had previously been doing the HEAD > > snapshots and I missed doing one very important adjustment to the > > build routine while doing the BETA1 builds, which resulted in the > > builds being based on HEAD. I didn't notice during the tests I do > > before uploading it because the build procedure makes most things > > (e.g. uname) say what you told it to build, you need to look harder > > to discover that sort of mistake. So, 7.0-BETA1 actually should > > have been called something more like 8.0-SURPRISE... :-( > > > > Sorry for the screw-up. > > > > This change seems to break portupgrade. It complains that it cannot > parse the output of uname. I think it is not capable of handling the > 1.5 after the BETA. > I hadn't tried that... When you do build a new kernel, it goes back to BETA1 though. Tuc