Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:43:03 -0500 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Adam Weinberger" <adamw@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading -CURRENT and will downgrade GNOME to 2.6... Message-ID: <opscqgt1kq9aq2h7@mezz> In-Reply-To: <20040814173711.GY96458@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <opscqfb51e9aq2h7@mezz> <20040814173711.GY96458@toxic.magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 13:37:11 -0400, Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >>> (08.14.2004 @ 1310 PST): Jeremy Messenger said, in 1.0K: << >> When I am done with the ruby-gtk2/gnome2 update, then do you want me to >> test with gnome_upgrade.sh for GNOME 2.6 -> 2.7.x? Unless, it's already >> well tested by adamw and/or whomever. If nobody reply on this part, >> then I >> will do the 'rm -rf /usr/local/* /usr/X11R6/* /compat/linux/* >> /var/db/pkg/*' and do the clean install instead gnome_upgrade.sh, >> because >> it is faster than portupgrade when do the big upgrade. >>> end of "Upgrading -CURRENT and will downgrade GNOME to 2.6..." from >>> Jeremy Messenger << > > I run full gnome_upgrade.sh upgrades every 2 or 3 days or so, > alternating between 4.x and 5.x. Isn't it why your machine has died from that? Poor your dear machine. ;-) > Unless there are errors, I run in the following order: > * clean 2.6 install > * clean 2.7 install > * clean 2.7-experimental install > * 2.6 -> 2.7 upgrade run > on 5-CURRENT and then 4-STABLE. package or ports or both? If you haven't test with package, then I can do it here at the same time test by run desktop to see if it functions fine. Cheers, Mezz > # Adam > > > -- > Adam Weinberger > adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org > adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org > http://www.vectors.cx -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?opscqgt1kq9aq2h7>